Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38575651›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Exploring local and global stability of COVID-19 through numerical schemes.

Nan Xiao, Hongyan Xu, Amjid Hussain Morani, Ali Shokri, Herbert Mukalazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nan XiaoSchool of Information and Engineering, Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen, 333403, China.
Hongyan XuSchool of Information and Engineering, Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen, 333403, China.
Amjid Hussain MoraniDepartment of Mathematics, Institute of Numerical Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, 29050, KPK, Pakistan.
Ali ShokriDepartment of Mathematics, Institute of Numerical Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, 29050, KPK, Pakistan.
Herbert MukalaziDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Kyambogo University, Kampala, Uganda. hmukalazi@kyu.ac.ug.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory sensitivity and pneumonia are possible outcomes of the coronavirus (COVID-19). Surface characteristics like temperature and sunshine affect how long the virus survives. This research article analyzes COVID-19 mathematical model behavior based on symptomatic and non-symptomatic individuals. In the reproductive model, the best result indicates the intensity of the epidemic. Our model remained stable at a certain point under controlled conditions after we evaluated a specific element. This approach is in place of traditional approaches such as Euler's and Runge-Kutta's. An unusual numerical approach known as the non-standard finite difference (NSFD) scheme is used in this article. This numerical approach gives us positivity. A dependable numerical analysis allowed us to evaluate different approaches and verify our theoretical results. Unlike the widely used Euler and RK4 approaches, we investigated the benefits of implementing NSFD schemes. By numerically simulating COVID-19 in a variety of scenarios, we demonstrated how our theoretical concepts work. The simulation findings support the usefulness of both approaches.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpidemicsComputer SimulationHumansModels, TheoreticalConfirmedDemonstratesDurationOutperformsRespiratorySimulationsSupported: unique

Identifiers

PMID38575651
PMCPMC10995177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.