ArticleScientific reports2024
Population-based cohort study to investigate the changes in prevalence, severity profile, and treatment modalities used in Korean atopic dermatitis patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics of Dupilumab-Treated Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Over Time: A Cross-Sectional Assessment of Potential Channeling Bias upon Pediatric Label Extension.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Treatment Patterns and Economic Burden in Moderate to Severe Chronic Hand Eczema in the USA: A Real-World Retrospective Claims Analysis.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Lifetime Atopic Dermatitis is Associated With Risk of Autoimmune Thyroid Disease: Evidence From a Nationwide Study.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2026Article
- Stress mediates the association between atopic dermatitis and sleep duration in Korean adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Investigation of the prevalence and treatment of atopic dermatitis in South Korea using a large national dataset.Korean journal of family medicine · 2025Article
- Harmonizing epidemiological research methodology for atopic dermatitis research: protocol for the EPISTAR international consensus exercise.Skin health and disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this retrospective study spanning from 2002 to 2019, we analyzed data from 355,277 Korean patients diagnosed with atopic dermatitis (AD) through the National Health Insurance System. Our objective was to comprehensively analyze the trends in prevalence, severity profiles, and treatment approaches for AD in Korea over this 18-year period. Initially, AD prevalence stood at 3.88% in 2002 but notably rose to 5.03% by 2019. During the same period, while AD prevalence decreased in the 0-1-year-old group (from 34.52% to 24.83%), it remained relatively stable in the 1-11-year-old group. Conversely, the 12-19-year-old and 20 years or older age groups witnessed substantial increases in AD prevalence, climbing from 2.55 to 6.02% and 1.44% to 3.53%, respectively. Moreover, the proportion of patients classified as having moderate to severe AD grew from 30.96 to 39.78%. Surprisingly, the prescription pattern, predominantly based on corticosteroid administration, exhibited minimal change despite the rising prevalence of moderate and severe AD cases. These findings underline a persistent reliance on corticosteroid-based treatments for AD, even as the condition's severity escalates among Korean adolescents and adults. Consequently, there is a pressing need to develop novel treatment guidelines emphasizing biologics that offer enhanced safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.