Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38575183›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2024

Improving access to general practice for and with people with severe and multiple disadvantage: a qualitative study.

Lucy C Potter, Tracey Stone, Julie Swede, Florrie Connell, Helen Cramer, Helen McGeown, Maria Carvalho, Jeremy Horwood, Gene Feder, Michelle Farr and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How do digital access and remote consultations in primary care impact patients affected by domestic abuse?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Coverage and quality of patient participation groups: a mixed-methods analysis of Care Quality Commission reports.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Patient removals: time to rethink exclusion in general practice?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Violence against women and girls: how can general practice respond?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tackling health inequalities together: inclusion health and co-production.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  10. Unpacking complexity in addressing the contribution of trauma to women's ill health: a qualitative study of perspectives from general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucy C PotterCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.ORCID 0000-0001-5380-5361
Tracey StoneCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol; National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol.ORCID 0000-0003-2627-3843
Julie SwedeOne25, Bristol.
Florrie ConnellOne25, Bristol.
Helen CramerCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Helen McGeownCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Maria CarvalhoOne25, Bristol.
Jeremy HorwoodCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol; National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol.ORCID 0000-0001-7092-4960
Gene FederCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.ORCID 0000-0002-7890-3926
Michelle FarrCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol; National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol.
Bridging Gaps
University of Bristol · GBAt Bristol · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with severe and multiple disadvantage (SMD) who experience combinations of homelessness, substance misuse, violence, abuse, and poor mental health have high health needs and poor access to primary care.

aimTo improve access to general practice for people with SMD by facilitating collaborative service improvement meetings between healthcare staff, people with lived experience of SMD, and those who support them; participants were then interviewed about this work. DESIGN AND

settingThe Bridging Gaps group is a collaboration between healthcare staff, researchers, women with lived experience of SMD, and a charity that supports them in a UK city. A project was co-produced by the Bridging Gaps group to improve access to general practice for people with SMD, which was further developed with three inner-city general practices.

methodNine service improvement meetings were facilitated at three general practices, and six of these were formally observed. Nine practice staff and four women with lived experience of SMD were interviewed. Three women with lived experience of SMD and one staff member who supports them participated in a focus group. Data were analysed inductively and deductively using thematic analysis.

resultsBy providing time and funding opportunities to motivated general practice staff and involving participants with lived experience of SMD, service changes were made in an effort to improve access for people with SMD. These included prioritising patients on an inclusion patient list with more flexible access, providing continuity for patients via a care coordinator and micro-team of clinicians, and developing an information-sharing document. The process and outcomes improved connections within and between general practices, support organisations, and people with SMD.

conclusionThe co-designed strategies described in this study could be adapted locally and evaluated in other areas. Investing in this focused way of working may improve accessibility to health care, health equity, and staff wellbeing.

Indexed as

General PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityIll-Housed PersonsQualitative ResearchAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementSubstance-Related DisordersUnited KingdomVulnerable Populationsaccess to health carecontinuity of caregeneral practicehealth inequalitiesservice organisationwomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID38575183
PMCPMC11005924
OpenAlexW4388574330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.