ArticleBone2024
Effects of dietary iron deficiency or overload on bone: Dietary details matter.
Article in Bone, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBone is susceptible to fluctuations in iron homeostasis, as both iron deficiency and overload are linked to poor bone strength in humans. In mice, however, inconsistent results have been reported, likely due to different diet setups or genetic backgrounds. Here, we assessed the effect of different high and low iron diets on bone in six inbred mouse strains (C57BL/6J, A/J, BALB/cJ, AKR/J, C3H/HeJ, and DBA/2J).
methodsMice received a high (20,000 ppm) or low-iron diet (∼10 ppm) after weaning for 6-8 weeks. For C57BL/6J males, we used two dietary setups with similar amounts of iron, yet different nutritional compositions that were either richer ("TUD study") or poorer ("UCLA study") in minerals and vitamins. After sacrifice, liver, blood and bone parameters as well as bone turnover markers in the serum were analyzed.
resultsAlmost all mice on the UCLA study high iron diet had a significant decrease of cortical and trabecular bone mass accompanied by high bone resorption. Iron deficiency did not change bone microarchitecture or turnover in C57BL/6J, A/J, and DBA/2J mice, but increased trabecular bone mass in BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ and AKR/J mice. In contrast to the UCLA study, male C57BL/6J mice in the TUD study did not display any changes in trabecular bone mass or turnover on high or low iron diet. However, cortical bone parameters were also decreased in TUD mice on the high iron diet.
conclusionThus, these data show that cortical bone is more susceptible to iron overload than trabecular bone and highlight the importance of a nutrient-rich diet to potentially mitigate the negative effects of iron overload on bone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.