Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38574190›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2024

Optimal Sequential Strategies for Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Evaluating Efficacy and Cross-Resistance.

Meiting Chen, Riqing Huang, Rishang Chen, Fei Pan, Xiujiao Shen, Haifeng Li, Qixiang Rong, Xin An, Cong Xue, Yanxia Shi

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A modular framework for antibody-drug conjugate biomarkers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Meiting ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Riqing HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Rishang ChenMedical Oncology Department III, Central Hospital of Guangdong Nongken, Zhanjiang, People's Republic of China.
Fei PanDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Xiujiao ShenDepartment of Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Haifeng LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Qixiang RongDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xin AnDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Cong XueDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yanxia ShiDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5414-8049
Sun Yat-sen University · CNCentral People's Hospital of Zhanjiang · CNShandong Tumor Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal sequential strategy for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in breast cancer remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and potential resistance of second ADC (ADC2) following the first ADC (ADC1) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and HER2-low MBC.

methodsThis retrospective, multicenter, real-world study enrolled patients with MBC who received at least 2 different types of ADCs in 3 hospitals in China between July 1, 2017 and May 1, 2023. Outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR) for ADC1 and ADC2, progression free survival 2 (PFS2), defined as the time from initiation of ADC2 to progression, and overall survival (OS).

resultsSeventy-nine female patients were included, 64 of whom had HER2-positive disease. The ORR for ADC2 with similar payload of ADC1 was found to be 5.3%. When switching to a different payload, the ORR of ADC2 increased to 22.6%. The PFS2 for ADC2 remained similar regardless of whether the payload was similar or different. Switching to different payload showed a higher ORR in patients with rapid progression and a durable response longer than 6 months (41.2% vs 15.0%). Specifically, significantly longer PFS2 and OS were seen in patients treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd) compared to those treated with disitamab vedotin (RC48) after progression from trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; median PFS2 5.37 months vs 3.30 months, HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.93, P = .034; median OS 50.6 months vs 20.2 months, HR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.08-0.91, P = .034). For patients who progressed after T-Dxd, the median PFS2 was 6.05 months for those treated with RC48 versus 0.93 months for those treated with T-DM1 (HR = 0.03, 95% CI 0.002-0.353, P = .0093). Genomic analysis revealed that alternation of retinoblastoma1 was significantly associated with superior PFS.

conclusionThe alternation of payload achieves different responses in different settings. T-Dxd followed by RC48 may be a potentially beneficial strategy in HER2-positive disease. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanism of cross-resistance.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmImmunoconjugatesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesTrastuzumabERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmunoconjugatesTrastuzumabantibody-drug conjugatedisitamab vedotinmetastatic breast cancersacituzumab govitecantrastuzumab deruxtecantrastuzumab emtansine

Identifiers

PMID38574190
PMCPMC11299950
OpenAlexW4393952006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.