Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38574161›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Mesoscale simulations predict the role of synergistic cerebellar plasticity during classical eyeblink conditioning.

Alice Geminiani, Claudia Casellato, Henk-Jan Boele, Alessandra Pedrocchi, Chris I De Zeeuw, Egidio D'Angelo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cerebellar control of targeted tongue movements.The Journal of physiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Purkinje cell models: past, present and future.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alice GeminianiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9407-8719
Claudia CasellatoDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Henk-Jan BoeleDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Alessandra PedrocchiNearLab, Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Chris I De ZeeuwDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Egidio D'AngeloDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · ITNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLPolitecnico di Milano · ITPrinceton University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the motor learning theory by Albus and Ito, synaptic depression at the parallel fibre to Purkinje cells synapse (pf-PC) is the main substrate responsible for learning sensorimotor contingencies under climbing fibre control. However, recent experimental evidence challenges this relatively monopolistic view of cerebellar learning. Bidirectional plasticity appears crucial for learning, in which different microzones can undergo opposite changes of synaptic strength (e.g. downbound microzones-more likely depression, upbound microzones-more likely potentiation), and multiple forms of plasticity have been identified, distributed over different cerebellar circuit synapses. Here, we have simulated classical eyeblink conditioning (CEBC) using an advanced spiking cerebellar model embedding downbound and upbound modules that are subject to multiple plasticity rules. Simulations indicate that synaptic plasticity regulates the cascade of precise spiking patterns spreading throughout the cerebellar cortex and cerebellar nuclei. CEBC was supported by plasticity at the pf-PC synapses as well as at the synapses of the molecular layer interneurons (MLIs), but only the combined switch-off of both sites of plasticity compromised learning significantly. By differentially engaging climbing fibre information and related forms of synaptic plasticity, both microzones contributed to generate a well-timed conditioned response, but it was the downbound module that played the major role in this process. The outcomes of our simulations closely align with the behavioural and electrophysiological phenotypes of mutant mice suffering from cell-specific mutations that affect processing of their PC and/or MLI synapses. Our data highlight that a synergy of bidirectional plasticity rules distributed across the cerebellum can facilitate finetuning of adaptive associative behaviours at a high spatiotemporal resolution.

Indexed as

CerebellumComputer SimulationConditioning, EyelidModels, NeurologicalNeuronal PlasticityAnimalsBlinkingCerebellar CortexComputational BiologyConditioning, ClassicalMicePurkinje CellsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID38574161
PMCPMC11060558
OpenAlexW4393928561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.