Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38574082›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Genetic identification of three CITES-listed sharks using a paper-based Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC).

Guuske P Tiktak, Alexandria Gabb, Margarita Brandt, Fernando R Diz, Karla Bravo-Vásquez, César Peñaherrera-Palma, Jonathan Valdiviezo-Rivera, Aaron Carlisle, Louise M Melling, Bradley Cain and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Guuske P TiktakEcology & Environment Research Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9258-5733
Alexandria GabbEcology & Environment Research Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Margarita BrandtColegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-9786-0490
Fernando R DizMarine Conservation Program, WWF Fisheries Ecuador, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
Karla Bravo-VásquezPlan de Acción Nacional para la Conservación y el Manejo de Tiburones de Ecuador, Viceministerio de Acuacultura y Pesca, Ministerio de Producción, Comercio Exterior, Inversiones y Pesca, Puerto Pesquero Artesanal de San Mateo, Manta, Manabí, Ecuador.
César Peñaherrera-PalmaMigraMar, Bodega Bay, CA, United States of America.
Jonathan Valdiviezo-RiveraInstituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.
Aaron CarlisleSchool of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, Lewes, Delaware, United States of America.
Louise M MellingEcology & Environment Research Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Bradley CainEcology & Environment Research Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
David MegsonEcology & Environment Research Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Richard PreziosiSchool of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Kirsty J ShawEcology & Environment Research Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Manchester Metropolitan University · GBInstituto Nacional de Biodiversidad · ECMinisterio de Salud Pública · ECUniversidad San Francisco de Quito · ECUniversity of Delaware · USUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Threatened shark species are caught in large numbers by artisanal and commercial fisheries and traded globally. Monitoring both which shark species are caught and sold in fisheries, and the export of CITES-restricted products, are essential in reducing illegal fishing. Current methods for species identification rely on visual examination by experts or DNA barcoding techniques requiring specialist laboratory facilities and trained personnel. The need for specialist equipment and/or input from experts means many markets are currently not monitored. We have developed a paper-based Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC) to facilitate identification of three threatened and CITES-listed sharks, bigeye thresher (Alopias superciliosus), pelagic thresher (A. pelagicus) and shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) at market source. DNA was successfully extracted from shark meat and fin samples and combined with DNA amplification and visualisation using Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) on the LOC. This resulted in the successful identification of the target species of sharks in under an hour, with a working positive and negative control. The LOC provided a simple "yes" or "no" result via a colour change from pink to yellow when one of the target species was present. The LOC serves as proof-of-concept (PoC) for field-based species identification as it does not require specialist facilities. It can be used by non-scientifically trained personnel, especially in areas where there are suspected high frequencies of mislabelling or for the identification of dried shark fins in seizures.

Indexed as

SharksAnimalsDNAEndangered SpeciesMeatSeafoodDNA

Identifiers

PMID38574082
PMCPMC10994358
OpenAlexW4393929225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.