Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38574056›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Provider attitudes towards quality improvement for myocardial infarction care in northern Tanzania.

Lauren A Coaxum, Francis M Sakita, Jerome J Mlangi, Godfrey L Kweka, Tumsifu G Tarimo, Gloria A Temu, Kajiru G Kilonzo, David Arthur, Janet P Bettger, Nathan M Thielman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren A CoaxumDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1630-1009
Francis M SakitaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Jerome J MlangiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Godfrey L KwekaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Tumsifu G TarimoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Gloria A TemuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Kajiru G KilonzoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-5826
David ArthurDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0839-3294
Janet P BettgerDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Temple University, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Nathan M ThielmanDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8152-2879
Alexander T LimkakengDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9822-5595
Julian T HertzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZDuke Medical Center · USTemple University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMyocardial Infarction (MI) is a leading cause of death worldwide. In high income countries, quality improvement strategies have played an important role in increasing uptake of evidence-based MI care and improving MI outcomes. The incidence of MI in sub-Saharan Africa is rising, but uptake of evidence-based care in northern Tanzania is low. There are currently no published quality improvement interventions from the region. The objective of this study was to determine provider attitudes towards a planned quality improvement intervention for MI care in northern Tanzania.

methodsThis study was conducted at a zonal referral hospital in northern Tanzania. A 41-question survey, informed by the Theoretical Framework for Acceptability, was developed by an interdisciplinary team from Tanzania and the United States. The survey, which explored provider attitudes towards MI care improvement, was administered to key provider stakeholders (physicians, nurses, and hospital administrators) using convenience sampling.

resultsA total of 140 providers were enrolled, including 82 (58.6%) nurses, 56 (40.0%) physicians, and 2 (1.4%) hospital administrators. Most participants worked in the Emergency Department or inpatient medical ward. Providers were interested in participating in a quality improvement project to improve MI care at their facility, with 139 (99.3%) strongly agreeing or agreeing with this statement. All participants agreed or strongly agreed that improvements were needed to MI care pathways at their facility. Though their facility has an MI care protocol, only 88 (62.9%) providers were aware of it. When asked which intervention would be the single-most effective strategy to improve MI care, the two most common responses were provider training (n = 66, 47.1%) and patient education (n = 41, 29.3%).

conclusionProviders in northern Tanzania reported strongly positive attitudes towards quality improvement interventions for MI care. Locally-tailored interventions to improve MI should include provider training and patient education strategies.

Identifiers

PMID38574056
PMCPMC10994299
OpenAlexW4393951799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.