Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38573981›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Improving the robustness of the Sequentially Optimized Reconstruction Strategy (SORS) for visual field testing.

Runjie Bill Shi, Moshe Eizenman, Yan Li, Willy Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Runjie Bill ShiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5690-2394
Moshe EizenmanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Yan LiThe Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5059-0932
Willy WongInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3900-3140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perimetry, or visual field test, estimates differential light sensitivity thresholds across many locations in the visual field (e.g., 54 locations in the 24-2 grid). Recent developments have shown that an entire visual field may be relatively accurately reconstructed from measurements of a subset of these locations using a linear regression model. Here, we show that incorporating a dimensionality reduction layer can improve the robustness of this reconstruction. Specifically, we propose to use principal component analysis to transform the training dataset to a lower dimensional representation and then use this representation to reconstruct the visual field. We named our new reconstruction method the transformed-target principal component regression (TTPCR). When trained on a large dataset, our new method yielded results comparable with the original linear regression method, demonstrating that there is no underfitting associated with parameter reduction. However, when trained on a small dataset, our new method used on average 22% fewer trials to reach the same error. Our results suggest that dimensionality reduction techniques can improve the robustness of visual field testing reconstruction algorithms.

Indexed as

Visual FieldsVisual Field TestsAlgorithmsRegression AnalysisSensory Thresholds

Identifiers

PMID38573981
PMCPMC10994286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.