Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38573763›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Exploring the Implementation of Shared Decision-Making Involving Health Coaches for Diabetes and Hypertension Self-Management: Qualitative Study.

Sungwon Yoon, Chao Min Tan, Jie Kie Phang, Venice Xi Liu, Wee Boon Tan, Yu Heng Kwan, Lian Leng Low

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sungwon YoonDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9458-6097
Chao Min TanCentre for Population Health Research and Implementation, SingHealth Regional Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3723-9344
Jie Kie PhangCentre for Population Health Research and Implementation, SingHealth Regional Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1357-8568
Venice Xi LiuCentre for Population Health Research and Implementation, SingHealth Regional Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8432-0148
Wee Boon TanCentre for Population Health Research and Implementation, SingHealth Regional Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2955-7983
Yu Heng KwanDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7802-9696
Lian Leng LowCentre for Population Health Research and Implementation, SingHealth Regional Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4228-2862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn emerging focus on person-centered care has prompted the need to understand how shared decision-making (SDM) and health coaching could support self-management of diabetes and hypertension.

objectiveThis study aims to explore preferences for the scope of involvement of health coaches and health care professionals (HCPs) in SDM and the factors that may influence optimal implementation of SDM from the perspectives of patients and HCPs.

methodsWe conducted focus group discussions with 39 patients with diabetes and hypertension and 45 HCPs involved in their care. The main topics discussed included the roles of health coaches and HCPs in self-management, views toward health coaching and SDM, and factors that should be considered for optimal implementation of SDM that involves health coaches. All focus group discussions were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsParticipants agreed that the main responsibility of HCPs should be identifying the patient's stage of change and medication education, while health coaches should focus on lifestyle education, monitoring, and motivational conversation. The health coach was seen to be more effective in engaging patients in lifestyle education and designing goal management plans as health coaches have more time available to spend with patients. The importance of a health coach's personal attributes (eg, sufficient knowledge of both medical and psychosocial management of disease conditions) and credentials (eg, openness, patience, and empathy) was commonly emphasized. Participants viewed that addressing the following five elements would be necessary for the optimal implementation of SDM: (1) target population (newly diagnosed and less stable patients), (2) commitment of all stakeholders (discrepancy on targeted times and modality), (3) continuity of care (familiar faces), (4) philosophy of care (person-centered communication), and (5) faces of legitimacy (physician as the ultimate authority).

conclusionsThe findings shed light on the appropriate roles of health coaches vis-à-vis HCPs in SDM as perceived by patients and HCPs. Findings from this study also contribute to the understanding of SDM on self-management strategies for patients with diabetes and hypertension and highlight potential opportunities for integrating health coaches into the routine care process.

Indexed as

decision-makingdiabeteshealthcare professionalhealth coachhealth coachinghypertensionpatientpatient-centered careperson-centered carequalitative researchself-managementshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID38573763
PMCPMC11027060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.