Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38573520›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2024

Diversity and Evolution of Frog Visual Opsins: Spectral Tuning and Adaptation to Distinct Light Environments.

Ryan K Schott, Matthew K Fujita, Jeffrey W Streicher, David J Gower, Kate N Thomas, Ellis R Loew, Abraham G Bamba Kaya, Gabriela B Bittencourt-Silva, C Guillherme Becker, Diego Cisneros-Heredia and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of Dybowski's Frog (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Effects of Light on Vertebrate Welfare: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 18 institutions in 10 countries.

Ryan K SchottDepartment of Biology and Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4015-3955
Matthew K FujitaDepartment of Biology, Amphibian and Reptile Diversity Research Center, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
Jeffrey W StreicherNatural History Museum, London, UK.
David J GowerNatural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1725-8863
Kate N ThomasDepartment of Biology, Amphibian and Reptile Diversity Research Center, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
Ellis R LoewDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Abraham G Bamba KayaInstitute de Recherches Agronomiques et Forestières, Libreville, Gabon.
Gabriela B Bittencourt-SilvaNatural History Museum, London, UK.
C Guillherme BeckerDepartment of Biology and One Health Microbiome Center, Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Diego Cisneros-HerediaLaboratorio de Zoología Terrestre, Instituto de Biodiversidad Tropical IBIOTROP, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador.
Simon ClulowCentre for Conservation Ecology and Genomics, Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia.
Mateo DavilaLaboratorio de Zoología Terrestre, Instituto de Biodiversidad Tropical IBIOTROP, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador.
Thomas J FirnenoDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Denver, Denver, USA.
Célio F B HaddadDepartment of Biodiversity and Center of Aquaculture-CAUNESP, I.B., São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sunita JanssenswillenAmphibian Evolution Lab, Biology Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Jim LabiskoNatural History Museum, London, UK.
Simon T MaddockNatural History Museum, London, UK.
Michael MahonyDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle 2308, Australia.
Renato A MartinsPrograma de Pós-graduação em Conservação da Fauna, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
Christopher J MichaelsIndependent Scholar, London, UK.
Nicola J MitchellSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Daniel M PortikDepartment of Herpetology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3518-7277
Ivan PratesDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6314-8852
Kim RoelantsAmphibian Evolution Lab, Biology Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Corey RoelkeDepartment of Biology, Amphibian and Reptile Diversity Research Center, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
Elie TobiGabon Biodiversity Program, Center for Conservation and Sustainability, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Gamba, Gabon.
Maya WoolfolkDepartment of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.
Rayna C BellDepartment of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0123-8833
Natural History Museum · GBSmithsonian Institution · USThe University of Texas at Arlington · USUniversidad San Francisco de Quito · ECVrije Universiteit Brussel · BECalifornia Academy of Sciences · USCornell University · USInstitut Africain d'Informatique · GALund University · SEOldham Council · GBOmar Bongo University · GAPennsylvania State University · USThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversity of Canberra · AUUniversity of Denver · USUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual systems adapt to different light environments through several avenues including optical changes to the eye and neurological changes in how light signals are processed and interpreted. Spectral sensitivity can evolve via changes to visual pigments housed in the retinal photoreceptors through gene duplication and loss, differential and coexpression, and sequence evolution. Frogs provide an excellent, yet understudied, system for visual evolution research due to their diversity of ecologies (including biphasic aquatic-terrestrial life cycles) that we hypothesize imposed different selective pressures leading to adaptive evolution of the visual system, notably the opsins that encode the protein component of the visual pigments responsible for the first step in visual perception. Here, we analyze the diversity and evolution of visual opsin genes from 93 new eye transcriptomes plus published data for a combined dataset spanning 122 frog species and 34 families. We find that most species express the four visual opsins previously identified in frogs but show evidence for gene loss in two lineages. Further, we present evidence of positive selection in three opsins and shifts in selective pressures associated with differences in habitat and life history, but not activity pattern. We identify substantial novel variation in the visual opsins and, using microspectrophotometry, find highly variable spectral sensitivities, expanding known ranges for all frog visual pigments. Mutations at spectral-tuning sites only partially account for this variation, suggesting that frogs have used tuning pathways that are unique among vertebrates. These results support the hypothesis of adaptive evolution in photoreceptor physiology across the frog tree of life in response to varying environmental and ecological factors and further our growing understanding of vertebrate visual evolution.

Indexed as

OpsinsRetinal PigmentsAnimalsAnuraGene DuplicationHumansMicrospectrophotometryOpsinsRetinal Pigmentsamphibiacodon-based selection modelssensory biologyvision research

Identifiers

PMID38573520
PMCPMC10994157
OpenAlexW4393951599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.