Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38573515›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Does lower dose pilocarpine have a role in radiation-induced xerostomia in the modern radiotherapy era? A single-center experience based on patient-reported outcome measures.

Dilek Gül, Beste M Atasoy, Ece Ercan, Zilan Başkan, Kıvanç Bektaş Kayhan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dilek GülS.B.-Marmara University Pendik Education and Research Hospital Radiation Oncology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey.
Beste M AtasoyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey. bmatasoy@marmara.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1320-9105
Ece ErcanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zilan BaşkanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kıvanç Bektaş KayhanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, İstanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
Marmara University · TRIstanbul University · TRMarmara Üniversitesi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to investigate the efficacy of lower dose pilocarpine in alleviating late dry mouth symptoms in head and neck cancer patients received radiotherapy.

methodsEighteen head and neck cancer patients experiencing persistent dry mouth were enrolled in this study. All participants started pilocarpine treatment a median of 6 months post-radiotherapy. Initially, patients received pilocarpine at 5 mg/day, with a gradual increase to the recommended dose of 15 mg/day. A Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement (PROMs) questionnaire assessed symptoms' severity related to hyposalivation.

resultsAll patients reported symptomatic dry mouth above grade 2 before starting the medication. Pilocarpine treatment continued based on patients' self-assessment, with a median duration of 12 months (range, 3-36 months). The median daily maintenance dose was 10 mg (range, 5 to 20 mg). Total PROMs scores significantly decreased following medication, from 13 points (range 7-18 points) to 7 points (range 4-13 points) (p = 0.001). Significant improvements were observed in questions related to dry mouth (p < 0.001), water intake during eating (p = 0.01), carrying water (p = 0.01), taste (p < 0.001), and water intake during speech (p < 0.001). Initial and maintenance doses of pilocarpine were lower, and the duration of pilocarpine usage was shorter in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy compared to conformal radiotherapy (12 months vs. 25 months, p = 0.04).

conclusionPilocarpine may be considered at doses lower for late-term dry mouth. With modern radiotherapy techniques effectively preserving the parotid gland, short-term use may be recommended in these patients. Future studies may enhance the development of a more robust patient selection criteria model.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMuscarinic AgonistsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPilocarpineRadiation InjuriesXerostomiaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeMuscarinic AgonistsPilocarpineLower dosePatient-reported outcome measurementPilocarpineRadiotherapyXerostomia

Identifiers

PMID38573515
PMCPMC11211147
OpenAlexW4393950562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.