Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38573403›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2024

A randomised controlled trial of a nurse facilitator to promote communication for family members of critically ill patients.

Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Elie Azoulay, Jean Reignier, Alain Cariou, Antoine Lafarge, Olivier Huet, Thomas Gargadennec, Anne Renault, Virginie Souppart, Pamela Clavier and 9 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ICU communication: 'state of the art'.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Nancy Kentish-BarnesMedical Intensive Care Unit, Famiréa Research Group, APHP, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France. nancy.kentish@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-0024-0429
Elie AzoulayMedical Intensive Care Unit, Famiréa Research Group, APHP, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France.
Jean ReignierMedical Intensive Care Unit, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Alain CariouParis Cité University, Paris, France.
Antoine LafargeMedical Intensive Care Unit, Famiréa Research Group, APHP, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France.
Olivier HuetAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Thomas GargadennecAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Anne RenaultMedical Intensive Care Unit, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Virginie SouppartMedical Intensive Care Unit, Famiréa Research Group, APHP, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France.
Pamela ClavierMedical Intensive Care Unit, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Fanny DilosquerMedical Intensive Care Unit, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Ludivine LerouxMedical Intensive Care Unit, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Sébastien LégéMedical Intensive Care Unit, APHP, Cochin University Hospital, Paris, France.
Anne RenetMedical Intensive Care Unit, Famiréa Research Group, APHP, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France.
Lyndia C BrumbackCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Ruth A EngelbergCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Frédéric PochardMedical Intensive Care Unit, Famiréa Research Group, APHP, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France.
Matthieu Resche-RigonParis Cité University, Paris, France.
J Randall CurtisCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Université Paris Cité · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRUniversity of Washington · USAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Cochin · FRSaint Louis University Hospital · USUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSuboptimal communication with clinicians, fragmented care and failure to align with patients' preferences are determinants of post intensive care unit (ICU) burden in family members. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a nurse facilitator on family psychological burden.

methodsWe carried out a randomised controlled trial in five ICUs in France comparing standard communication by ICU clinicians to additional communication and support by nurse facilitators. We included patients > 18 years, with expected ICU length of stay > 2 days, chronic life-limiting illness, and their family members. Facilitators were trained to help families to secure care in line with patient's goals, beginning in ICU and continuing for 3 months. Assessments were made at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months post-randomisation. Primary outcome was the evolution of family symptoms of depression over 6 months using a linear mixed effects model on the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Secondary outcomes included HADS-Anxiety, Impact of Event Scale-6, goal-concordant care and experience of serious illness (QUAL-E).

results385 patients and family members were enrolled. Follow-up at 1-, 3- and 6-month was completed by 284 (74%), 264 (68.6%) and 260 (67.5%) family members respectively. The intervention was associated with significantly more formal meetings between the ICU team and the family (1 [1-3] vs 2 [1-4]; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in evolution of symptoms of depression over 6 months (p = 0.91), nor in symptoms of depression at 6 months [0.53 95% CI (- 0.48; 1.55)]. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes.

conclusionThis study does not support the use of facilitators for family members of ICU patients.

Indexed as

CommunicationCritical IllnessFamilyIntensive Care UnitsProfessional-Family RelationsAdultAgedDepressionFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedCommunicationFamily membersIntensive careNurse facilitatorPost-ICU burden

Identifiers

PMID38573403
OpenAlexW4393949388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.