Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38573395›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2024

Use of platelet- and leukocyte-rich fibrin (L-PRF) as a healing agent in the postoperative period of third molar removal surgeries: a systematic review.

Eduardo Dias Ribeiro, Ilan Hudson Gomes de Santana, Mayara Rebeca Martins Viana, Julliana Cariry Palhano Freire, Osny Ferreira-Júnior, Eduardo Sant'Ana

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. PRF and PRP in Dentistry: An Umbrella Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eduardo Dias RibeiroDepartment of Clinical and Social Dentistry (DCOS), Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Ilan Hudson Gomes de SantanaHealth Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil. ilan.hudson@academico.ufpb.br.
Mayara Rebeca Martins VianaCentro Universitário de João Pessoa-UNIPÊ, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Julliana Cariry Palhano FreireParaíba State Employees Health Care Institute - IASS, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Osny Ferreira-JúniorBauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (FOB-USP), Bauru, Brazil.
Eduardo Sant'AnaBauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (FOB-USP), Bauru, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BRCentro Universitário de João Pessoa · BRInstituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of L-PRF as a healing agent in the postoperative period of third molar extraction surgeries, as well as to investigate secondary effects, such as the reduction of pain, edema and other discomforts after the surgical intervention. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe methodology adopted consisted of carrying out a systematic review of the literature, following the model outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The inclusion criteria were previously established according to a systematic review protocol approved by the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under number CRD42023484679. In order to carry out a comprehensive search, a search in five databases was carried out, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Embase.

resultsThe search resulted in the selection of randomized controlled trials that conformed to the established criteria. Two authors independently screened the records and extracted the data. The assessment of bias was conducted according to the guidelines recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration, using version 2 of the Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB 2).

conclusionThis study demonstrated that L-PRF stands out by providing direct benefits to healing, vascularization and tissue regeneration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: L-PRF plays an important role in reducing postoperative pain, edema, the incidence of alveolar osteitis and infections after third molar removal surgery, compared to patients who did not undergo the use of L-PRF.

Indexed as

Molar, ThirdPlatelet-Rich FibrinTooth ExtractionWound HealingHumansLeukocytesPostoperative ComplicationsDentistryMolarsOral surgical proceduresPlatelet-rich fibrinWound healing

Identifiers

PMID38573395
OpenAlexW4393938646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.