Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38573376›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2024

Socioeconomic inequalities in psychosocial well-being among adolescents under the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-regional comparative analysis in Hong Kong, mainland China, and the Netherlands.

Gary Ka-Ki Chung, Xiaoting Liu, Karlijn Massar, Karen Schelleman-Offermans, Hans Bosma, Yat-Hang Chan, Siu-Ming Chan, Ji-Kang Chen, Hung Wong, Roger Yat-Nork Chung

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gary Ka-Ki ChungCUHK Institute of Health Equity, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Xiaoting LiuSchool of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Karlijn MassarDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Karen Schelleman-OffermansDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Hans BosmaDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Yat-Hang ChanCUHK Institute of Health Equity, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Siu-Ming ChanCityU Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, The City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ji-Kang ChenDepartment of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Hung WongCUHK Institute of Health Equity, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Roger Yat-Nork ChungCUHK Institute of Health Equity, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. rychung@cuhk.edu.hk.

Funding

Worldwide Universities Network N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite evidence on socioeconomic inequalities in psychosocial well-being of adolescents under the COVID-19 pandemic, the explanatory factors and their potential variations across contexts remained understudied. Hence, this cross-regional study compared the extent of inequalities and the mediating pathways across Hong Kong, Mainland China, and the Netherlands.

methodsBetween July 2021 and January 2022, 25 secondary schools from diverse socioeconomic background were purposively sampled from Hong Kong, Zhejiang (Mainland China), and Limburg (the Netherlands). 3595 junior students completed an online survey during class about their socioeconomic position, psychosocial factors, and well-being. Socioeconomic inequalities were assessed by multiple linear regressions using the Slope Index of Inequality (SII), whereas the mediating pathways through learning difficulty, overall worry about COVID-19, impact on family' financial status, resilience, trust in government regarding pandemic management, and adaptation to social distancing were examined by mediation analyses moderated by regions.

resultsThe adverse psychosocial impact of COVID-19 was stronger in the Netherlands and Hong Kong compared with Mainland China. The greatest extent of socioeconomic inequalities in the change in psychosocial well-being was observed among students in the Netherlands (SII = 0.59 [95% CI = 0.38-0.80]), followed by Hong Kong (SII = 0.37 [0.21-0.52]) and Mainland China (SII = 0.12 [0.00-0.23]). Learning difficulty and resilience were the major mediators in Mainland China and Hong Kong, but to a lesser extent in the Netherlands.

conclusionSocioeconomic inequalities in psychosocial well-being were evident among adolescents under the pandemic, with learning difficulty and resilience of students as the key mediators. Differences in the social contexts should be considered to better understand the variations in inequalities and mediating pathways across regions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Socioeconomic FactorsAdolescentChinaFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHong KongHumansMaleMental HealthNetherlandsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2StudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentsCOVID-19Cross-regionalMediatorPsychosocial well-beingSocioeconomic inequality

Identifiers

PMID38573376
PMCPMC11522043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.