SynthesisJournal of neurology2024
Prevalence and epidemiology of stroke in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Pathological signatures of white matter lesions in multiple sclerosis versus stroke: a synthetic MRI study.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Comorbidity and modifiable risk factors in multiple sclerosis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Review
- Neurocardiology Update: The Brain-Heart Connection in Multiple Sclerosis-A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Risk of stroke under disease modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Review
- Multiple Sclerosis-like Lesions Induced by Radiation: A Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidemiological data are sparse regarding the risk of stroke in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).
objectiveTo estimate the following: (1) the pooled prevalence of all-cause stroke, acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) in MS patients; (2) the relative risk for all-cause stroke, AIS and ICH in MS patients compared to the general population; (3) associations between patient characteristics and the risk for AIS and ICH in MS patients.
methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of registry-based and cohort studies.
resultsThirteen observational studies comprising 146,381 MS patients were included. The pooled prevalence of all-cause stroke was 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-4.6%), with the relative risk of all-cause stroke being higher in MS patients compared to the general population (RR: 2.55; 95% CI 1.97-3.29). Subgroup analyses per stroke subtype revealed a pooled AIS prevalence of 2.1% (95% CI 0.8-4.1%) and a pooled ICH prevalence of 0.6% (95% CI 0.2-1.2%). Compared to the general population, patients with MS were found to harbour an increased risk for AIS (RR: 2.79; 95% CI 2.27-3.41) and ICH (RR: 2.31; 95% CI 1.04-5.11), respectively. The pooled prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in MS patients was 11.5% (95% CI 2.9-24.7%) for dyslipidaemia, 18.2% (95% CI 5.9-35.3%) for hypertension and 5.4% (95% CI 2.1-10.2%) for diabetes. In meta-regression, age was negatively associated with AIS risk (β = - .03, p = 0.04), with a 1-year increase in age resulting in a significant 3% (95%CI 0-5) attenuation of the risk of AIS.
conclusionThe findings of the present meta-analysis indicate that MS is associated with an increased risk for ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke. Future well-designed epidemiological studies are warranted to corroborate the robustness of the present findings in the MS population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.