ArticlePediatric radiology2024
The role of an abbreviated ultrasound in the evaluation of necrotizing enterocolitis.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging and Non-Imaging Approaches for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Necrotizing Enterocolitis-What Lies Ahead?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparison of bedside abdominal ultrasonography and abdominal radiography in predicting surgical intervention in neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Gastrointestinal emergencies and monitoring in preterm infants: a review.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- A standardized universal protocol for using adjunct abdominal ultrasound at the time of diagnosis for suspected necrotizing enterocolitis.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
- Improving diagnostic interpretability of abdominal ultrasound for neonates with suspected intestinal injury.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBowel ultrasound is a useful diagnostic tool in the diagnosis and management of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) but can be time-consuming and requires technical expertise, particularly for assessing pneumatosis. Previous literature on sonographic evaluation of NEC has focused on a full bowel ultrasound protocol, but the utility of an abbreviated protocol primarily aimed at identifying high-risk sonographic findings without focused bowel assessment has not been well studied.
objectiveThis study aims to describe the diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated ultrasound protocol for identifying high-risk NEC findings. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a retrospective, institutional review board-approved study. We identified all abbreviated NEC ultrasounds performed between January 2014 and August 2022 at our institution. Exams were reviewed for the presence of high-risk findings including pneumoperitoneum, fluid collections, and complex free fluid. Clinical outcome was categorized as poor or good depending on if emergent surgical intervention or death related to NEC occurred. The frequency of follow-up NEC ultrasounds was reviewed to determine if new findings affected outcome. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were generated to assess the performance of the abbreviated ultrasounds to identify high-risk findings.
resultsA total of 84 abbreviated abdominal ultrasounds were performed on 73 children. Median age at the time of ultrasound was 41 days (interquartile range (IQR) 53 days) and median gestational age was 35 weeks and 3 days (IQR 80 days), and 44/73 (60%) were male. Thirteen ultrasounds had at least one high-risk finding with nine (69%) resulting in a poor outcome, including seven surgical interventions and four deaths. Two patients had surgical intervention and died as a result of necrotizing enterocolitis. Ultrasounds without high-risk findings were not associated with poor clinical outcomes. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the abbreviated NEC ultrasound were 100% (95% CI 60-100%), 95% (95% CI 86-98%), 69% (95% CI 39-90%), and 100% (95% CI 94-100%), respectively. Twelve abbreviated ultrasounds were followed by a second NEC ultrasound within 5 days. Five follow-up ultrasounds demonstrated new high- or low-risk findings, but the new findings did not correlate with a change in outcome as predicted by the initial ultrasound.
conclusionAn abbreviated NEC ultrasound can be of clinical utility in predicting poor outcomes, particularly during non-business hours when resources are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.