Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38573343›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2024

Development of an innovative analytical method for forensic detection of cocaine, antidepressants, and metabolites in postmortem blood using magnetic nanoparticles.

Patricia de Souza Schwarz, Bruno Pereira Dos Santos, Letícia Birk, Sarah Eller, Tiago Franco de Oliveira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patricia de Souza SchwarzGraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil. patriciasc@ufcspa.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0370-7602
Bruno Pereira Dos SantosGraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7624-5966
Letícia BirkGraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9229-5840
Sarah EllerGraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2200-6959
Tiago Franco de OliveiraGraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-8415

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior CAPES - Finance Code 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cocaine and antidepressants rank high globally in substance consumption, emphasizing their impact on public health. The determination of these compounds and related substances in biological samples is crucial for forensic toxicology. This study focused on developing an innovative analytical method for the determination of cocaine, antidepressants, and their related metabolites in postmortem blood samples, using unmodified commercial Fe

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsCocaineForensic ToxicologyMagnetite NanoparticlesSolid Phase ExtractionTandem Mass SpectrometryAdultChromatography, LiquidFemaleHumansLimit of DetectionMaleSubstance Abuse DetectionAntidepressive AgentsCocaineMagnetite NanoparticlesDispersive extractionLC–MS/MSMagnetic nanoparticlesPostmortem blood

Identifiers

PMID38573343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.