ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024
Collaborative and privacy-enhancing workflows on a clinical data warehouse: an example developing natural language processing pipelines to detect medical conditions.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Electronic health record-based prediction models for dementia detection: a systematic review of model performance and quality.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Pooled it
- Natural language processing in dermatology: A systematic literature review and state of the art.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2024Pooled it
- Classifying Sickle Cell Disease Subtypes from Clinical Reports: Algorithm Validation and ICD-10 Accuracy Assessment in Five French Hospitals.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Building a National Interoperable Rare Eye Disease Data Warehouse: Methodological Framework and Implementation Report From the French Rare Eye Disease Database (FREDD) Initiative.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- A Sentence Classification-Based Medical Status Extraction Pipeline for Electronic Health Records: Institutional Case Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Mining the prodrome of neurodegeneration.Nature aging · 2026Article
- Quantifying the effects of pseudonymisation on epidemiological research reliability: a tailored evaluation using a clinical data warehouse.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Development and Assessment of a Pipeline for Extracting Structured Data From Free-Text Medical Reports Using a Large Language Model.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
- Comparing three natural language processing methods for the automatic identification of epilepsy patients from French clinical notes.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Hybrid rule-based and on-premises LLM pipeline for extracting CMR and CPET metrics from free-text reports in repaired tetralogy of Fallot.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Enhancing the Utility of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessment Tools in Abdominal Wall Hernia (AWH) Surgery Through Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Framework Proposal.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a natural language processing (NLP) pipeline that detects 18 conditions in French clinical notes, including 16 comorbidities of the Charlson index, while exploring a collaborative and privacy-enhancing workflow. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe detection pipeline relied both on rule-based and machine learning algorithms, respectively, for named entity recognition and entity qualification, respectively. We used a large language model pre-trained on millions of clinical notes along with annotated clinical notes in the context of 3 cohort studies related to oncology, cardiology, and rheumatology. The overall workflow was conceived to foster collaboration between studies while respecting the privacy constraints of the data warehouse. We estimated the added values of the advanced technologies and of the collaborative setting.
resultsThe pipeline reached macro-averaged F1-score positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity of 95.7 (95%CI 94.5-96.3), 95.4 (95%CI 94.0-96.3), 96.0 (95%CI 94.0-96.7), and 99.2 (95%CI 99.0-99.4), respectively. F1-scores were superior to those observed using alternative technologies or non-collaborative settings. The models were shared through a secured registry.
conclusionsWe demonstrated that a community of investigators working on a common clinical data warehouse could efficiently and securely collaborate to develop, validate and use sensitive artificial intelligence models. In particular, we provided an efficient and robust NLP pipeline that detects conditions mentioned in clinical notes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.