ArticleGigaScience2024
Pangenome databases improve host removal and mycobacteria classification from clinical metagenomic data.
Article in GigaScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Rapid identification of microbial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance from bloodstream infections using long-read sequencing.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Review
- Advancing Plant Microbiome Research Through Host DNA Depletion Techniques.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Cleanifier: contamination removal from microbial sequences using spaced seeds of a human pangenome index.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Environmental surveillance of bacteria in a new intensive care unit using plate sweeps.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Genome graphs reveal the importance of structural variation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis evolution and drug resistance.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Challenges and Opportunities in Analyzing Cancer-Associated Microbiomes.Cancer research · 2025Review
- WorkflowHub: a registry for computational workflows.Scientific data · 2025Article
- TwoViruses · 2025Article
- Article
- Filtering out the noise: metagenomic classifiers optimize ancient DNA mapping.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Pangenome databases improve host removal and mycobacteria classification from clinical metagenomic data.GigaScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCulture-free real-time sequencing of clinical metagenomic samples promises both rapid pathogen detection and antimicrobial resistance profiling. However, this approach introduces the risk of patient DNA leakage. To mitigate this risk, we need near-comprehensive removal of human DNA sequences at the point of sequencing, typically involving the use of resource-constrained devices. Existing benchmarks have largely focused on the use of standardized databases and largely ignored the computational requirements of depletion pipelines as well as the impact of human genome diversity.
resultsWe benchmarked host removal pipelines on simulated and artificial real Illumina and Nanopore metagenomic samples. We found that construction of a custom kraken database containing diverse human genomes results in the best balance of accuracy and computational resource usage. In addition, we benchmarked pipelines using kraken and minimap2 for taxonomic classification of Mycobacterium reads using standard and custom databases. With a database representative of the Mycobacterium genus, both tools obtained improved specificity and sensitivity, compared to the standard databases for classification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Computational efficiency of these custom databases was superior to most standard approaches, allowing them to be executed on a laptop device.
conclusionsCustomized pangenome databases provide the best balance of accuracy and computational efficiency when compared to standard databases for the task of human read removal and M. tuberculosis read classification from metagenomic samples. Such databases allow for execution on a laptop, without sacrificing accuracy, an especially important consideration in low-resource settings. We make all customized databases and pipelines freely available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.