Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38573172›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Fully automatic online geometric calibration for non-circular cone-beam CT orbits using fiducials with unknown placement.

Yiqun Q Ma, Tess Reynolds, Tina Ehtiati, Clifford Weiss, Kelvin Hong, Nicholas Theodore, Grace J Gang, J Webster Stayman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Forward and Back Projectors for Gradient-based Rigid Motion Estimation in X-ray Imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  4. Joint Cone-Beam CT Reconstruction and Rigid Motion Compensation Using A Differentiable Projector.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yiqun Q MaJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5941-0739
Tess ReynoldsFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Tina EhtiatiSiemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.
Clifford WeissJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kelvin HongJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nicholas TheodoreJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Grace J GangUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
J Webster StaymanJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USSiemens Healthineers (Germany) · DEThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Task-Driven 3D Interventional ImagingR01EB027127 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STAYMAN, JOSEPH WEBSTER · 2019 to 2022
$1.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027127NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB027127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCone-beam CT (CBCT) with non-circular scanning orbits can improve image quality for 3D intraoperative image guidance. However, geometric calibration of such scans can be challenging. Existing methods typically require a prior image, specialized phantoms, presumed repeatable orbits, or long computation time. PURPOSE: We propose a novel fully automatic online geometric calibration algorithm that does not require prior knowledge of fiducial configuration. The algorithm is fast, accurate, and can accommodate arbitrary scanning orbits and fiducial configurations.

methodsThe algorithm uses an automatic initialization process to eliminate human intervention in fiducial localization and an iterative refinement process to ensure robustness and accuracy. We provide a detailed explanation and implementation of the proposed algorithm. Physical experiments on a lab test bench and a clinical robotic C-arm scanner were conducted to evaluate spatial resolution performance and robustness under realistic constraints.

resultsQualitative and quantitative results from the physical experiments demonstrate high accuracy, efficiency, and robustness of the proposed method. The spatial resolution performance matched that of our existing benchmark method, which used a 3D-2D registration-based geometric calibration algorithm.

conclusionsWe have demonstrated an automatic online geometric calibration method that delivers high spatial resolution and robustness performance. This methodology enables arbitrary scan trajectories and should facilitate translation of such acquisition methods in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCone-Beam Computed TomographyAutomationCalibrationFiducial MarkersHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPhantoms, ImagingC‐armCBCTfiducial configurationgeometric calibrationimage qualityinterventional imagingquality controltask‐driven imaging

Identifiers

PMID38573172
PMCPMC11963847
OpenAlexW4393932807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.