Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38572970›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2024

Development and evaluation of an artificial intelligence for bacterial growth monitoring in clinical bacteriology.

Damien Jacot, Shklqim Gizha, Cedrick Orny, Mathieu Fernandes, Carmelo Tricoli, Raphael Marcelpoil, Guy Prod'hom, Jean-Marc Volle, Gilbert Greub, Antony Croxatto

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Damien JacotInstitute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9932-5443
Shklqim GizhaInstitute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cedrick OrnyBecton Dickinson Kiestra, Le Pont-de-Claix, France.
Mathieu FernandesBecton Dickinson Kiestra, Le Pont-de-Claix, France.
Carmelo TricoliBecton Dickinson Kiestra, Le Pont-de-Claix, France.
Raphael MarcelpoilBecton Dickinson Kiestra, Le Pont-de-Claix, France.
Guy Prod'homInstitute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Marc VolleBecton Dickinson Kiestra, Le Pont-de-Claix, France.
Gilbert GreubInstitute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9529-3317
Antony CroxattoInstitute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical bacteriology laboratories, reading and processing of sterile plates remain a significant part of the routine workload (30%-40% of the plates). Here, an algorithm was developed for bacterial growth detection starting with any type of specimens and using the most common media in bacteriology. The growth prediction performance of the algorithm for automatic processing of sterile plates was evaluated not only at 18-24 h and 48 h but also at earlier timepoints toward the development of an early growth monitoring system. A total of 3,844 plates inoculated with representative clinical specimens were used. The plates were imaged 15 times, and two different microbiologists read the images randomly and independently, creating 99,944 human ground truths. The algorithm was able, at 48 h, to discriminate growth from no growth with a sensitivity of 99.80% (five false-negative [FN] plates out of 3,844) and a specificity of 91.97%. At 24 h, sensitivity and specificity reached 99.08% and 93.37%, respectively. Interestingly, during human truth reading, growth was reported as early as 4 h, while at 6 h, half of the positive plates were already showing some growth. In this context, automated early growth monitoring in case of normally sterile samples is envisioned to provide added value to the microbiologists, enabling them to prioritize reading and to communicate early detection of bacterial growth to the clinicians.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBacteriaSensitivity and SpecificityAlgorithmsAutomation, LaboratoryBacterial InfectionsBacteriological TechniquesBacteriologyCulture MediaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedCulture Mediaartificial intelligencebacteriologygrowth monitoringsterile plates

Identifiers

PMID38572970
PMCPMC11077979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.