Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38572524›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2024

Real-world experience with eculizumab and switching to ravulizumab for generalized myasthenia gravis.

Daiki Tokuyasu, Shigeaki Suzuki, Akiyuki Uzawa, Yuriko Nagane, Masayuki Masuda, Shingo Konno, Tomoya Kubota, Makoto Samukawa, Takamichi Sugimoto, Kei Ishizuchi and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Italian recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. C5 complement inhibition versus FcRn modulation in generalised myasthenia gravis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025
    Observational
  13. New and Emerging Biological Therapies for Myasthenia Gravis: A Focussed Review for Clinical Decision-Making.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Daiki TokuyasuDepartment of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeaki SuzukiDepartment of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4388-4574
Akiyuki UzawaDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9252-1863
Yuriko NaganeDepartment of Neurology, Hanamaki General Hospital, Hanamaki, Japan.
Masayuki MasudaDepartment of Neurology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shingo KonnoDepartment of Neurology, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoya KubotaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory and Biomedical Sciences, Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Makoto SamukawaDepartment of Neurology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Sayama, Japan.
Takamichi SugimotoDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience and Therapeutics, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kei IshizuchiDepartment of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Munenori OyamaDepartment of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Manato YasudaDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroyuki AkamineDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Yosuke OnishiDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Yasushi SuzukiDepartment of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Naoki KawaguchiDepartment of Neurology, Neurology Chiba Clinic, Chiba, Japan.
Naoya MinamiDepartment of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Takashi KimuraDepartment of Neurology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Masanori P TakahashiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory and Biomedical Sciences, Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroyuki MuraiDepartment of Neurology, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan.
Kimiaki UtsugisawaDepartment of Neurology, Hanamaki General Hospital, Hanamaki, Japan.
Chiba University · JPKeio University · JPNational Hospital Organization Hanamaki Hospital · JPOsaka Health Science University · JPChiba Hospital · JPHiroshima University · JPHyogo Medical University · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JPKindai University · JPNational Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center · JPSendai Medical Center · JPToho University · JPTokyo Medical University · JP

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP20H03592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEculizumab and ravulizumab are complement protein C5 inhibitors, showing efficacy and tolerability for patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor-positive (AChR+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) in phase 3 clinical trials and subsequent analyses. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical significance of eculizumab and switching to ravulizumab for refractory AChR+ gMG patients in the real-world experience.

methodsAmong the database of Japan MG registry survey 2021, we studied AChR+ gMG patients who received eculizumab. We also evaluated these patients who switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab. Responder was defined as an improvement of at least 3 points in MG-ADL. We performed a questionnaire of preference between eculizumab and ravulizumab.

resultsAmong 1,106 patients with AChR+ gMG, 36 patients (3%) received eculizumab (female 78%, mean age 56.0 years). Eculizumab was preferentially used in severe and refractory MG patients. The duration of eculizumab treatment was 35 months on average. MG-ADL improved from 9.4 ± 4.9 to 5.9 ± 5.1, and 25 (70%) of the 36 gMG patients were responders. Postintervention status was markedly improved after the eculizumab treatment. Of 13 patients who did not continue eculizumab, 6 showed insufficiencies. Early onset MG was most effective. However, 15 patients switching from eculizumab to ravulizumab kept favorable response and tolerability. Questionnaire surveys showed preference for ravulizumab over eculizumab.

interpretationEculizumab and switching to ravulizumab showed to be effective for refractory AChR+ gMG patients in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedComplement Inactivating AgentsMyasthenia GravisAdultAgedDrug SubstitutionFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedComplement Inactivating Agents

Identifiers

PMID38572524
PMCPMC11093249
OpenAlexW4393947986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.