Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38572457›Full record

ReviewPrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2023

Tissue classification and diagnosis of colorectal cancer histopathology images using deep learning algorithms. Is the time ripe for clinical practice implementation?

David Dimitris Chlorogiannis, Georgios-Ioannis Verras, Vasiliki Tzelepi, Anargyros Chlorogiannis, Anastasios Apostolos, Konstantinos Kotis, Christos-Nikolaos Anagnostopoulos, Andreas Antzoulas, Spyridon Davakis, Michail Vailas and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Breaking surgical barriers: ERAS in action in Romania.Journal of medicine and life · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David Dimitris ChlorogiannisDepartment of D/I Radiology, Patras General Hospital, Patras, Greece.
Georgios-Ioannis VerrasDepartment of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Vasiliki TzelepiDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Anargyros ChlorogiannisKarolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anastasios ApostolosFirst Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos KotisIntelligent Systems Lab, Department of Cultural Technology and Communication, University of the Aegean, Mytilene, Greece.
Christos-Nikolaos AnagnostopoulosIntelligent Systems Lab, Department of Cultural Technology and Communication, University of the Aegean, Mytilene, Greece.
Andreas AntzoulasDepartment of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Spyridon DavakisUpper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery Unit, First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Michail VailasUpper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery Unit, First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios SchizasUpper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery Unit, First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Francesk MulitaDepartment of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the most prevalent types of cancer, with histopathologic examination of biopsied tissue samples remaining the gold standard for diagnosis. During the past years, artificial intelligence (AI) has steadily found its way into the field of medicine and pathology, especially with the introduction of whole slide imaging (WSI). The main outcome of interest was the composite balanced accuracy (ACC) as well as the F1 score. The average reported ACC from the collected studies was 95.8 ±3.8%. Reported F1 scores reached as high as 0.975, with an average of 89.7 ±9.8%, indicating that existing deep learning algorithms can achieve

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecolorectal cancerdeep learning algorithmssurgical practice

Identifiers

PMID38572457
PMCPMC10985751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.