ReviewGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology2024
Pan-Enteric Capsule Endoscopy: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.
Review in GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of magnetically guided capsule endoscopy on gastrointestinal transit time and diagnostic yield: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- New Technologies for IBD Endoscopy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Low-volume bowel preparation provides safe and effective pan-enteric capsule endoscopy in suspected or established Crohn's disease.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Article
- Pan-enteric Capsule Endoscopy in Crohn's Disease: Impact on Therapeutic Decisions and Inter-observer Agreement in a Multicentre Case-based Study.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Effect of Multiple Pharmacological Interventions and Magnetic Control on Capsule Endoscopy Gastrointestinal Transit Time and Diagnostic Yield: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted versus conventional reading in pan-intestinal capsule endoscopy for suspected mid-lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Best Approach for Incomplete Colonoscopy: Colon Capsule Endoscopy or Repeat Conventional Colonoscopy?GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Integration of Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Capsule Endoscopy in Clinical Practice: A Review of Market-Available Tools for Clinical Practice.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Review
- The Future of Minimally Invasive GI and Capsule Diagnostics (REFLECT), October 2024.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Colon Capsule Utilisation in Europe-CAPTURE EU Survey Findings.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Capsule endoscopy for small bowel bleed: Current update.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Capsule endoscopy and panendoscopy: A journey to the future of gastrointestinal endoscopy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Marking 25 years of capsule endoscopy: from bold innovation to enduring legacy.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The role of capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of the small bowel is well established, and current guidelines position it as a first-line test in a variety of clinical scenarios. The advent of double-headed capsules further enabled the endoscopic assessment of colonic mucosa and the opportunity for a one-step noninvasive examination of the entire bowel (pan-enteric capsule endoscopy [PCE]). Summary: We reviewed the technical procedure and preparation of patients for PCE, as well as its current clinical applications and future perspectives. In non-stricturing and non-penetrating Crohn's disease affecting the small bowel and colon, PCE monitors disease activity by assessing mucosal healing, a major treatment outcome, with a higher diagnostic yield than cross-sectional imaging or conventional colonoscopy. Also in ulcerative colitis, double-headed capsules have been used to monitor disease activity noninvasively. Currently, validated scoring systems have been specifically devised for these double-headed capsules and permit a standardized assessment of the inflammatory burden. In suspected mid-lower digestive bleeding, some exploratory studies have demonstrated the feasibility and high diagnostic yield of PCE, which may work as a filter indicating which patients may benefit of further invasive procedures, namely, for planned hemostatic procedures. The possibility of using PCE is also discussed in the context of polyposis syndromes with simultaneous involvement of the small intestine and colon. Key Messages: PCE is a feasible, effective, and safe diagnostic procedure to evaluate the small bowel and colon. It has been increasingly explored in the setting of inflammatory bowel diseases and, more recently, in suspected mid-lower digestive bleeding. PCE is expected to reduce the demand for invasive procedures and expand the scope of noninvasive intestinal evaluation in the coming future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.