Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38572394›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2024

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Stroke in Emergency Departments.

Vida Abedi, Debdipto Misra, Durgesh Chaudhary, Venkatesh Avula, Clemens M Schirmer, Jiang Li, Ramin Zand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vida AbediDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7689-933X
Debdipto MisraDivision of Informatics, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
Durgesh ChaudharyGeisinger Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2683-5482
Venkatesh AvulaDepartment of Molecular and Functional Genomics, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
Clemens M SchirmerGeisinger Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
Jiang LiDepartment of Molecular and Functional Genomics, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
Ramin ZandDepartment of Neurology, Pennsylvania State University, 30 Hope Drive, PO Box 859, Hershey, PA 17033-0859, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9477-0094

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stroke misdiagnosis, associated with poor outcomes, is estimated to occur in 9% of all stroke patients. Objectives: We hypothesized that machine learning (ML) could assist in the diagnosis of ischemic stroke in emergency departments (EDs). Design: The study was conducted and reported according to the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis guidelines. We performed model development and prospective temporal validation, using data from pre- and post-COVID periods; we also performed a case study on a small cohort of previously misdiagnosed stroke patients. Methods: We used structured and unstructured electronic health records (EHRs) of 56,452 patient encounters from 13 hospitals in Pennsylvania, from September 2003 to January 2021. ML pipelines, including natural language processing, were created using pre-event clinical data and provider notes in the EDs. Results: Using pre-event information, our model's area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) ranged from 0.88 to 0.92 with a similar range accuracy (0.87-0.90). Using provider notes, we identified five models that reached a balanced performance in terms of AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity. Model AUROC ranged from 0.93 to 0.99. Model sensitivity and specificity reached 0.90 and 0.99, respectively. Four of the top five performing models were based on the post-COVID provider notes; however, no performance difference between models tested on pre- and post-COVID was observed. Conclusion: This study leveraged pre-event and at-encounter level EHR for stroke prediction. The results indicate that available clinical information can be used for building EHR-based stroke prediction models and ED stroke alert systems.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceemergency departmentischemic strokemachine learningnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID38572394
PMCPMC10989051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.