Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38572221›Full record

ReviewArchives of academic emergency medicine2024

Artificial Intelligence in Optimizing the Functioning of Emergency Departments; a Systematic Review of Current Solutions.

Szymczyk Aleksandra, Krion Robert, Krzyzaniak Klaudia, Lubian Dawid, Sieminski Mariusz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Glance at Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Journal in 2024.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Editorial letter: Artificial Intelligence can be used to improve the humanity of care.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Szymczyk AleksandraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland.
Krion RobertDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland.
Krzyzaniak KlaudiaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland.
Lubian DawidDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland.
Sieminski MariuszDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The burgeoning burden on emergency departments is a global challenge that we have been confronting for many years. Emerging artificial intelligence (AI)-based solutions may constitute a critical component in the optimization of these units. This systematic review was conducted to thoroughly examine and summarize the currently available AI solutions, assess potential benefits from their implementation, and identify anticipated directions of further development in this fascinating and rapidly evolving field. Methods: This systematic review utilized data compiled from three key scientific databases: PubMed (2045 publications), Scopus (877 publications), and Web of Science (2495 publications). After meticulous removal of duplicates, we conducted a detailed analysis of 2052 articles, including 147 full-text papers. From these, we selected 51 of the most pertinent and representative publications for the review. Results: Overall the present research indicates that due to high accuracy and sensitivity of machine learning (ML) models it's reasonable to use AI in support of doctors as it can show them the potential diagnosis, which could save time and resources. However, AI-generated diagnoses should be verified by a doctor as AI is not infallible. Conclusions: Currently available AI algorithms are capable of analysing complex medical data with unprecedented precision and speed. Despite AI's vast potential, it is still a nascent technology that is often perceived as complicated and challenging to implement. We propose that a pivotal point in effectively harnessing this technology is the close collaboration between medical professionals and AI experts. Future research should focus on further refining AI algorithms, performing comprehensive validation, and introducing suitable legal regulations and standard procedures, thereby fully leveraging the potential of AI to enhance the quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEmergency medicineEmergency servicehospitalMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38572221
PMCPMC10988184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.