Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38572156›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2024

Sex-differences in COPD: from biological mechanisms to therapeutic considerations.

Kathryn M Milne, Reid A Mitchell, Olivia N Ferguson, Alanna S Hind, Jordan A Guenette

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Sex Differences in Lung Immunity.Immunological reviews · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. The importance of mechanical forces in chronic respiratory diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Sex, hormones, and lung health.Physiological reviews · 2026
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn M MilneCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, The University of British Columbia and Providence Research, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Reid A MitchellCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, The University of British Columbia and Providence Research, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Olivia N FergusonCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, The University of British Columbia and Providence Research, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alanna S HindCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, The University of British Columbia and Providence Research, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jordan A GuenetteCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, The University of British Columbia and Providence Research, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CASt. Paul's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous respiratory condition characterized by symptoms of dyspnea, cough, and sputum production. We review sex-differences in disease mechanisms, structure-function-symptom relationships, responses to therapies, and clinical outcomes in COPD with a specific focus on dyspnea. Females with COPD experience greater dyspnea and higher morbidity compared to males. Imaging studies using chest computed tomography scans have demonstrated that females with COPD tend to have smaller airways than males as well as a lower burden of emphysema. Sex-differences in lung and airway structure lead to critical respiratory mechanical constraints during exercise at a lower absolute ventilation in females compared to males, which is largely explained by sex differences in maximum ventilatory capacity. Females experience similar benefit with respect to inhaled COPD therapies, pulmonary rehabilitation, and smoking cessation compared to males. Ongoing re-assessment of potential sex-differences in COPD may offer insights into the evolution of patterns of care and clinical outcomes in COPD patients over time.

Indexed as

chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasedyspneaexercise physiologyexercise testingsex-differences

Identifiers

PMID38572156
PMCPMC10989064
OpenAlexW4393001966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.