Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38572090›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Evaluation of a Virtual Reality-Based Open Educational Resource Software.

Silvia Würstle, Lisa-Marie Spanke, Niklas Mehlhase, Gail Stanley, Jonathan Koff, Stavros Dimitriadis, Sarah König, Alexander Hann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Silvia WürstleDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Lisa-Marie SpankeInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Department of Internal Medicine II, Gastroenterology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Niklas MehlhaseInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Department of Internal Medicine II, Gastroenterology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Gail StanleyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Jonathan KoffDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Stavros DimitriadisDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.
Sarah KönigInstitute of Medical Teaching and Medical Education Research, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Alexander HannInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Department of Internal Medicine II, Gastroenterology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8035-3559
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEYale University · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Coventry · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesVirtual reality (VR) teaching methods have potential to support medical students acquire increasing amounts of knowledge. EVENT (Easy VR EducatioN Tool) is an open educational resource software for immersive VR environments, which is designed for use without programming skills. In this work, EVENT was used in a medical student VR course on pancreatic cancer.

methodsMedical students were invited to participate in the course. Before and after VR simulation, participants completed a multiple-choice knowledge assessment, with a maximum score of 10, and a VR experience questionnaire. The primary endpoint compared pre- and post-VR simulation test scores. Secondary endpoints included usability and factors that could affect learning growth and test results.

resultsData from 117 of the 135 participating students was available for analysis. Student test scores improved by an average of 3.4 points (95% CI 3.1-3.7,

conclusionsWe present a freely available software that allows for the development of VR teaching lessons without programming skills.

Indexed as

educational toolsmedical educationopen educational resource softwarevirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID38572090
PMCPMC10989036
OpenAlexW4393622287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.