Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38571927›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and immunology research2024

Adalimumab in the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Results from a Delphi investigation.

Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Francesco Ciccia, Rosario Foti, Alessandro Giunta, Francesco Loconsole, Francesca Prignano, Rossana Scrivo, Giampiero Girolomoni

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and immunology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Biological Treatment of Psoriasis-Data So Far.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Marco Matucci-CerinicDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine & Department of Geriatric Medicine, Division of Rheumatology AOUC, University of Florence, Italy and Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology Allergy and Rare Disease (UnIRAR), IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Francesco CicciaDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Rosario FotiUnit of Immunology, Rheumatology Allergy and Rare Disease (UnIRAR), IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro GiuntaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Francesco LoconsoleDepartment of Medicine Dermatology Section, University of Bari, Bari Italy.
Francesca PrignanoDepartment of Health Science, Section of Dermatology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Rossana ScrivoDepartment of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Rheumatology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome Italy.
Giampiero GirolomoniDepartment of Medicine, Section of Dermatology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are often undertreated and require a multidisciplinary approach. In recent years, patent expiration has allowed the introduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (anti-TNF) biosimilars, which have stimulated a significant increase in the use of biological therapies. This article reports the findings of a multidisciplinary approach to achieve a consensus on the use of adalimumab in patients with PsO or PsA. Methods: A voting panel of 36 Italian dermatologists and rheumatologists were chosen by eight Italian clinicians (the Board), to provide a consensus on the real-world management of PsO and PsA with adalimumab using the Delphi Method, comprising three survey rounds. Twelve statements were defined by the Board and submitted to the panel (rating scale 1-7). Results: Clinicians reached a wide consensus on the effectiveness (score 6-7: 67%) and long-term efficacy (6-7: 100%) of adalimumab in all clinical forms of PsO and PsA, including pediatric patients (6-7: 85%). Considering cost-effectiveness and safety, adalimumab is suggested as a first-line treatment in patients with enthesitis, predominant peripheral arthritis, axial involvement or associated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or uveitis. Adalimumab can be also considered after failure of etanercept (6-7: 94%). Conclusion: Results from this Delphi study clearly show an overall consensus on the use of adalimumab in the management of PsO and PsA, particularly as first-choice for specific subpopulations (uveitis, IBD, hidradenitis suppurativa). Considering the cost-effectiveness of biosimilars within Italy, adalimumab may represent an effective and safe first-line treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe PsO or PsA, and a valid choice for switching after failure.

Indexed as

adalimumabconsensuspsoriasispsoriatic arthritisswitch

Identifiers

PMID38571927
PMCPMC10985702
OpenAlexW4393423992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.