ReviewCureus2024
Osteogenic Potential of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles in Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnesium-Based Membrane for Alveolar Ridge Regeneration-A Scoping Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Nature-Based Hydrogels Combined with Nanoparticles for Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Novel Nanomaterials for Developing Bone Scaffolds and Tissue Regeneration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Emerging nanomaterials capable of effectively facilitating osteoblast maturation.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Biomaterial Scaffolds for Periodontal Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Development and characterization of novel magnesium oxide nanoparticle-impregnated chitosan-based guided tissue regeneration membrane - AnJournal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) plays a crucial role in the augmentation of alveolar bone, especially in cases of dental implants. The main principle behind using membranes in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) is to prevent epithelial downgrowth as well as connective tissue on the root surface. However, the membranes lack some major properties, such as osteogenic and antimicrobial properties. Magnesium (Mg) is one of the biodegradable materials that is gaining interest because of its favourable mechanical properties and biocompatibility. It also possesses pro-osteogenic properties and significant inhibition of biofilm formation and maturation. These features have attracted increasing interest in using magnesium oxide nanoparticles in GBR membrane applications. This systematic review assesses the osteogenic potential of magnesium oxide nanoparticles in periodontal bone regeneration. The literature search used PubMed, PubMed Central, Medline, and Cochrane databases to examine systematic reviews published till March 2023. Seven articles were included based on the selection criteria. We included all in vitro and in vivo clinical studies based on the osteogenic potential of magnesium oxide nanoparticles in periodontal bone regeneration. The seven studies provided evidence that magnesium oxide nanoparticles, when incorporated in any substrate, showed higher osteogenic potential in terms of higher alkaline phosphatase levels, bone volume fraction, and bone mineral density. The optimum concentration of magnesium oxide can be an ideal additive to various substrates to promote bone regeneration. Because most of the studies were conducted on calvarial defects, further studies should focus only on bone regeneration related to periodontal regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.