Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38571812›Full record

ArticleCase reports in nephrology and dialysis

Successful Removal and Replacement of a Stuck Hemodialysis Catheter via Thoracotomy: Report of Two Cases and Literature Review.

Yanqin Fan, Dejiao He, Jing Cheng, Zhenzhong Wu, Yiqun Hao, Hongyan Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in nephrology and dialysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanqin FanDivision of Nephrology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Dejiao HeDivision of Nephrology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Jing ChengDivision of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Zhenzhong WuDivision of Interventional Radiography, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yiqun HaoDivision of Nephrology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Hongyan LiuDivision of Nephrology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Stuck tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) have been increasingly reported. In rare cases, the impossibility of extracting the CVC from the central vein after regular traction is the result of rigid adhesions to the surrounding fibrin sheath. Forced traction during catheter removal can cause serious complications, including cardiac tamponade, hemothorax, and hemorrhagic shock. Knowledge and experience on how to properly manage the stuck catheter are still limited. Case Presentation: Here, we present two cases that highlight the successful removal of the stuck tunneled CVC via thoracotomy through the close collaboration of multidisciplinary specialists in the best possible way. Both patients underwent an unsuccessful attempt at thrombolytic therapy with urokinase, catheter traction under the guidance of digital subtraction angiography and intraluminal balloon dilation. And we reviewed the literature on stuck catheters in the hope of providing knowledge and effective approaches to attempted removal of stuck catheters. Conclusion: There is no standardized procedure for dealing with stuck catheters. Intraluminal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty should be considered as the first-line treatment, while open surgery represents a second option only in the event of failure. Care must be taken that forced extubation can cause patients life-threatening.

Indexed as

Central venous catheterFibrin sheathHemodialysis accessOpen surgeryStuck catheter

Identifiers

PMID38571812
PMCPMC10990479
OpenAlexW4393852436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.