Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38571788›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Influence of tree cover on carcass detection and consumption by facultative vertebrate scavengers.

Elke Wenting, Patrick A Jansen, Luke Pattipeilohy, Peter van Lunteren, Henk Siepel, Frank van Langevelde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Farmland abandonment and season drive scavenging dynamics in livestock-rewilded landscapes.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elke WentingDepartment of Environmental Sciences Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4745-7521
Patrick A JansenDepartment of Environmental Sciences Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4660-0314
Luke PattipeilohyDepartment of Animal Ecology and Physiology Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Peter van LunterenAddax Data Science Utrecht The Netherlands.
Henk SiepelDepartment of Environmental Sciences Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4503-4485
Frank van LangeveldeDepartment of Environmental Sciences Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8870-0797
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLGlaxoSmithKline (Netherlands) · NLSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PAWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scavenging mammals and vultures can exploit and deplete carcasses much faster than other birds and invertebrates. Vultures are strongly influenced by habitat type, e.g. tree cover, since they rely on their eyesight to detect carcasses. It remains unclear whether and how facultative scavengers - both other birds and mammals - are influenced by tree cover and how that affect carcass decomposition time, which in turn affects biodiversity and ecological processes, including the cycle of energy and nutrients. We studied whether the carcass detection and consumption, hence carcass decomposition speed, by facultative avian and mammalian scavengers varies with tree cover in areas without vultures. Fresh mammal carcasses were placed in different landscapes across the Netherlands at locations that widely varied in tree cover. Camera traps were used to record carcass exploitation by facultative avian and mammalian scavengers and to estimate carcass decomposition time. We found that carcass detection and consumption by birds, wild boar, and other mammals varied between locations. Carcass decomposition speed indeed increased with carcass detection and exploitation by mammals, especially by wild boar. However, this variation was not related to tree cover. We conclude that tree cover is not a major determinant of carcass exploitation by facultative scavengers in areas without obligate scavengers and large carnivores.

Indexed as

carcass decompositioncarrionfacultative scavengerstree coverwild boar

Identifiers

PMID38571788
PMCPMC10985364
OpenAlexW4393442516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.