ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Comparative analysis of four nutritional scores in predicting adverse outcomes in biopsy-confirmed diabetic kidney Disease.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Triglyceride-cholesterol-body weight index and microvascular complications in Tibetan adults with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Objective tongue phenotyping and nutritional risk in diabetic kidney disease: a dual-centre study linking quantified tongue features to the controlling nutritional status score.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Association between nutritional‑inflammatory status and diabetic retinopathy in adults with diabetes: insights from a US population‑based survey and a Chinese hospital‑based clinical cohort.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Association between the composite nutritional index TCBI and ISR.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Association of triglyceride-glucose index with diabetic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Article
- Independent predictive role of nutritional markers in kidney function decline and mortality in diabetes.Metabolism open · 2025Article
- Predictive values of four nutritional indices for adverse outcomes in patients with hypertension.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2025Article
- Trends and Disparities in the Burden of Chronic Kidney Disease due to Type 2 Diabetes in China From 1990 to 2021: A Population-Based Study.Journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- Unraveling the role of cumulative triglyceride-total cholesterol-body weight index in stroke development: evidence from the CHARLS cohort.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Malnutrition is associated with severe outcome in elderly patients hospitalised with COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malnutrition is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). However, it is uncertain which nutritional assessment tools are most effective in predicting the adverse outcomes of DKD. This retrospective study was conducted at a single center and included 367 patients diagnosed with DKD based on biopsy results between August 2009 and December 2018. Four nutritional assessment indices, namely the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), Triglycerides (TG) × Total Cholesterol (TC) × Body Weight (BW) Index (TCBI), and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, were selected and calculated. We aimed to assess the association between these nutritional scores and adverse outcomes, including progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), cardiovascular diseases events (CVD), and all-cause mortality. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, Kaplan-Meier analysis, along with Restricted cubic spline analysis were used to examine the relationship between nutritional scores and adverse outcomes. Furthermore, the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using time-dependent receiver operating characteristics to determine the predictive value of the four nutritional scores alone and some combinations. Lastly, ordered logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the correlation between the four nutritional scores and different renal histologic changes. The incidence of ESKD, CVD, and all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with DKD who had a lower PNI, lower GNRI, and higher CONUT score. Additionally, The TCBI performed the worst in terms of grading and risk assessment. The PNI offer the highest predictive value for adverse outcomes and a stronger correlation with renal histologic changes compared to other nutritional scores. Patients diagnosed with DKD who have a worse nutritional status are more likely to experience higher rates of adverse outcomes. The PNI might offer more valuable predictive values and a stronger correlation with different renal histologic changes compared to other nutritional scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.