ArticleHeliyon2024
Heterogeneous relations among environmental regulation, technological innovation, and environmental pollution.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of artificial intelligence on green economy efficiency under integrated governance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, interprovincial panel data of China from 2011 to 2020 are selected and empirically examined to determine the effects of three types of environmental regulation tools: command-and-control, market-incentive, and public-participation types. Then, hierarchical regression analysis and instrumental variables are used to analyze and verify the mediating role of technological innovation. Results show no significant relationship between command-and-control regulation and environmental pollution, while market-incentive and public-participation regulations have a significantly negative inhibitory effect on environmental pollution and contribute to pollution reduction. In addition, product and process innovations play partially mediating roles between market-incentive regulation and environmental pollution and between public-participation regulation and environmental pollution, respectively, thus indicating that technological innovation is an effective way to reduce pollutant emissions. Compared with product innovation, process innovation has a better effect on pollution emission reduction but a smaller incentive effect under environmental regulation. This finding indicates that enterprise technology innovation and environmental regulation fail to achieve a suitable match for maximizing environmental benefits. Further analysis shows that the effects of the three types of environmental regulation tools on reducing pollution emissions vary in different periods and show significant changes around 2010. The effects of command-based regulation weaken, while those of the pollution abatement of market-incentive and public-participation regulations increase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.