Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38571490›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology

A multi-institutional update on surgical outcomes after penile silicone sleeve implantation.

Alexandra R Siegal, Kenan E Celtik, Shirin Razdan, Michaela Sljivich, Bryan Kansas, Bhavik Shah, Laurence A Levine, Robert J Valenzuela

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Penile Volume Augmentation With Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Ultrasound Observation.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra R SiegalDepartment of Urology, Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9104-8434
Kenan E CeltikDepartment of Urology, Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Shirin RazdanDepartment of Urology, Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Michaela SljivichDepartment of Urology, Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Bryan KansasUrology Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Bhavik ShahAdvanced Urology, Decatur, GA, USA.
Laurence A LevineRush University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4465-6349
Robert J ValenzuelaDepartment of Urology, Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The increasing popularity of the silicone sleeve penile implant has been accompanied by concerns over potential risks and adverse events. Objectives: To provide multi-institutional data on safety outcomes in patients undergoing silicone sleeve penile implant surgery across high-volume implant surgeons. In addition, we discuss preventative techniques to minimize postoperative complications and the management of these events. Design and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of men undergoing penile silicone sleeve implants between November 2020 and November 2022 with four surgeons, each from a separate institution. Perioperative and postoperative adverse events, including unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes requiring revision, were determined by physician follow-up. Flaccid penile length and girth were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: A total of 299 male patients underwent silicone sleeve implant surgery, with an average age of 42.5 ± 10.5 years and an average body mass index of 28.5 ± 4.0. The patient cohort exhibited minimal comorbidities, with 5% having hyperlipidemia, 2% being smokers, 2% having cardiovascular disease, and 1% having diabetes. Patients experienced an average increase of 4.1 ± 1.5 cm in their flaccid penile length (a 50% increase) and an average increase of 3.4 ± 1.5 cm in their flaccid girth (a 37% increase) ( Conclusion: This is the largest study to characterize the safety of the penile silicone sleeve implant across multiple institutions. In men who desire cosmetic size augmentation, silicone sleeve implant surgery is associated with significantly increased flaccid penile length and girth. Complications are mainly cosmetic and may be corrected; however, patients should be appropriately counseled on the risk of erosion, which appears to be higher than previously reported.

Indexed as

cosmeticerect penisflaccid penishimplantpenile girthpenile lengthpenile sizepenumaphalloplastysilicone

Identifiers

PMID38571490
PMCPMC10989031
OpenAlexW4393631226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.