ArticleJournal of food science2024
Assessing the potential of Australian indigenous edible halophytes as salt substitutes: From wild to plate.
Article in Journal of food science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Valorisation of the HalophyteFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Increased salt (sodium chloride (NaCl)) consumption contributes to high blood pressure, increasing the risk of cardiovascular disease. Reducing the intake of NaCl could result in significant public health benefits. Australian grown halophytes are consumed traditionally by indigenous communities as food and medicine. The importance of halophytes has been recently "rediscovered" due to their salty taste and crunchy texture. This study aimed to assess the potential of Australian indigenous edible halophytes (AIEH) as salt substitutes. A benchtop test was carried out to establish a sensory lexicon of four important AIEH (samphire, seapurslane, seablite, and saltbush) and to select the most promising halophyte based on sensory attributes and nutritional composition. Samphire and saltbush, the most common and commercially important halophytes, were used as comparisons. Semolina was used to prepare the halophyte-based test food for the benchtop sensory study. Results of the formal sensory study showed that the growing location of samphire and saltbush can significantly affect their sensory attributes. Samphire had the most favorable sensory attributes and nutritional quality, with dry herb and bran aroma and flavor, whereas the saltbush test food preparations had herbaceous, minty dry wood, and green fruit aroma and flavor. The "optimal" concentration of added freeze-dried samphire/saltbush powder was determined based on the saltiness perception of the NaCl-semolina formulation (0.3% table salt equivalent to 1% samphire freeze-dried powder and 1.4%-2.0% saltbush freeze-dried powder, respectively). This study provided novel and crucial information on the potential use of AIEH as natural salt substitutes. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: There is an increasing demand for natural salt substitutes. Halophytes are salt tolerant plants that sustain in arid or semiarid areas and have the potential to be used as natural salt substitutes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the sensory profiles of four important Australian indigenous edible halophytes (samphire, seapurslane, seablite, and saltbush). This study also demonstrated how different growing locations can affect the sensory attributes of halophytes and subsequently their potential food applications. Our findings provide critical information and data to further study halophytes in the context of novel food applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.