ArticleLupus2024
Home monitoring of fetal heart rhythm: Lived experiences of women with anti-SSA/Ro52 autoantibodies and their co-parents.
Article in Lupus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the parents' experiences of home monitoring of the fetal heart rhythm. Women with anti-SSA/Ro52 autoantibodies carry a 2%-3% risk of giving birth to a child with congenital heart block (CHB), following transplacental transfer and antibody-mediated inflammation in the fetal conduction system during 18th to 24th gestational week. Early detection and subsequent treatment have been reported to decrease morbidity and mortality. Therefore, home monitoring of the fetal heart rhythm by Doppler has been offered at our fetal cardiology center. This study was undertaken to explore the lived experience of the routine.
methodsParticipants were recruited from a single fetal cardiology center. Consecutive sampling was used. The inclusion criteria were women with SSA/Ro52 antibodies who had undergone Doppler examinations within the last two and a half years at the hospital and had monitored the fetal heartbeat at home. A semi-structured questionnaire was created, and the participants were interviewed individually. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed according to qualitative content analysis.
resultsThe overall theme was defined as "walking on thin ice," with six underlying categories: reality, different strategies, gain and loss, healthcare providers, underlying tension, and conducting the examinations again, all with a focus on how to handle the home monitoring during the risk period.
conclusionBoth the mother and the co-parent expressed confidence in their own abilities and that the monitoring provided them with the advantage of growing a bond with the expected child. However, all the participants described a feeling of underlying tension during the risk period. The results show that home monitoring is not experienced as complicated or a burden for the parents-to-be and should be considered a vital part of the chain of care for mothers at risk for giving birth to a child with CHB. However, explaining the teamwork between the different caregivers, for the patients involved, their areas of expertise, and how they collaborate with the patient continues to be a pedagogic challenge and should be developed further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.