ArticleCurrent radiopharmaceuticals2024
The Diverse Utility of Contrast Media Delivery and Dosing During Computed Tomography: An International Assessment of Knowledge and Practices.
Article in Current radiopharmaceuticals, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond guesswork: addressing the wide variability in pediatric iodinated contrast media delivery from an international perspective.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- So many countries, so many customs, so many ways of using CT.European radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the escalated production rate, the Iodinated Contrast Media (ICM) shortage continues, and demand outweighs supply.
aimThe aim of this study is to investigate the knowledge and practice of ICM delivery in computed tomography (CT) among radiographers and radiologic technologists worldwide.
methodsAn IRB-approved cross-sectional survey used Google Forms for data collection. It involved 94 CT radiographers from 27 countries and was divided into five sections. The first section gathered demographic information, followed by sections on experience, self-assessment of ICM reactions, and delivery technique. The third section explored ICM knowledge and its relation to CT parameters. The fourth and fifth sections focus on practices during pulmonary angiography CT and renal CT scans. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, the Chi- Square test, and ANOVA.
resultsKnowledge was assessed with seven questions, and a score of at least 3.5 was needed for categorization. The median score was two, indicating low knowledge. Specifically, 64.9% of the participants scored lower than the two scores. Years of experience are strongly correlated with the level of knowledge, with 51.6% of radiographers having more than 10 years of experience demonstrating adequate knowledge. 41.7% of respondents demonstrated adequate knowledge when their duty was focused on CT. Furthermore, wide practice variability exists in all CT pulmonary angiography protocols among radiographers with adequate and inadequate knowledge.
conclusionInexperienced individuals showed knowledge gaps, leading to varied practices and highlighting the need for educational programs. The study underscores establishing standardized Protocols and Practice Guidelines (PPGs) for contrast media administration in Radiology Departments. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of regular training programs, and international knowledge sharing. The potential for self-selection bias in the online survey sample is highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.