ArticleCancer science2024
Development and validation of a radiosensitivity model to evaluate radiotherapy benefits in pan-cancer.
Article in Cancer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pan-Cancer Gene Expression Predicts Per-Cancer Radiation Therapy Response.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- PPP2R2C confers radioresistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by suppressing ferroptosis via RPS27L stabilization.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Integrating digital solutions improves mental health management in cancer care.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Deciphering the role ofJournal of translational internal medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a radiosensitivity model to evaluate radiotherapy benefits in pan-cancer.Cancer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiotherapy, one of the most fundamental cancer treatments, is confronted with the dilemma of treatment failure due to radioresistance. To predict the radiosensitivity and improve tumor treatment efficiency in pan-cancer, we developed a model called Radiation Intrinsic Sensitivity Evaluation (RISE). The RISE model was built using cell line-based mRNA sequencing data from five tumor types with varying radiation sensitivity. Through four cell-derived datasets, two public tissue-derived cohorts, and one local cohort of 42 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, we demonstrated that RISE could effectively predict the level of radiation sensitivity (area under the ROC curve [AUC] from 0.666 to 1 across different datasets). After the verification by the colony formation assay and flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis, our four well-established radioresistant cell models successfully proved higher RISE values in radioresistant cells by RT-qPCR experiments. We also explored the prognostic value of RISE in five independent TCGA cohorts consisting of 1137 patients who received radiation therapy and found that RISE was an independent adverse prognostic factor (pooled multivariate Cox regression hazard ratio [HR]: 1.84, 95% CI 1.39-2.42; p < 0.01). RISE showed a promising ability to evaluate the radiotherapy benefit while predicting the prognosis of cancer patients, enabling clinicians to make individualized radiotherapy strategies in the future and improve the success rate of radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.