Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38570851›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2024

Merit of integrating in situ transcriptomics and anatomical information for cell annotation and lineage construction in single-cell analyses of Populus.

Ying-Lan Chen, Jo-Wei Allison Hsieh, Shang-Che Kuo, Chung-Ting Kao, Chia-Chun Tung, Jhong-He Yu, Tien-Hsien Chang, Chuan Ku, Jianbo Xie, Deqiang Zhang and 2 more

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ying-Lan Chen *Department of Biotechnology and Bioindustry Sciences, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. cyl0828@gs.ncku.edu.tw.
Jo-Wei Allison Hsieh *Department of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shang-Che KuoGenome and Systems Biology Degree Program, National Taiwan University and Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chung-Ting KaoInstitute of Plant Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Chun TungDepartment of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jhong-He YuInstitute of Plant Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tien-Hsien ChangGenomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chuan KuInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jianbo XieNational Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Deqiang ZhangNational Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Quanzi LiState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
Ying-Chung Jimmy LinDepartment of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. YCJimmyLin@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0001-7120-4690

Funding

National Cheng Kung University Higher Education Sprout ProjectNational Cheng Kung University Ministry of Education to the Headquarters of University Advancement at National Cheng Kung UniversityNational Science and Technology Council NSTC 111-2636-B-006-015National Science and Technology Council NSTC 112-2311-B-002-023-MY3National Science and Technology Council Taiwan MOST International Young Scholar Fellowship Program 110-2628-B-002-026National Science and Technology Council Taiwan MOST International Young Scholar Fellowship Program 111-2628-B-002-020National Science and Technology Council Taiwan MOST Young Scholar Fellowship Einstein Program 109-2636-B-006-009National Science and Technology Council Taiwan MOST Young Scholar Fellowship Einstein Program 110-2636-B-006-008National Science and Technology Council Taiwan MOST Young Scholar Fellowship Einstein Program NSTC 112-2636-B-006-006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell type annotation and lineage construction are two of the most critical tasks conducted in the analyses of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Four recent scRNA-seq studies of differentiating xylem propose four models on differentiating xylem development in Populus. The differences are mostly caused by the use of different strategies for cell type annotation and subsequent lineage interpretation. Here, we emphasize the necessity of using in situ transcriptomes and anatomical information to construct the most plausible xylem development model.

Indexed as

PopulusGene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeXylem

Identifiers

PMID38570851
PMCPMC10988922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.