ArticleScientific reports2024
A comprehensive approach to characterize navigation instruments for magnetic guidance in biological systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adapting PRISMA Guidelines to Enhance Reporting Quality in Genetic Association Studies: A Framework Proposal.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Pooled it
- 3D-printed weight holders design and testing in mouse models of spinal cord injury.Frontiers in drug delivery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Achieving non-invasive spatiotemporal control over cellular functions, tissue organization, and behavior is a desirable aim for advanced therapies. Magnetic fields, due to their negligible interaction with biological matter, are promising for in vitro and in vivo applications, even in deep tissues. Particularly, the remote manipulation of paramagnetic (including superparamagnetic and ferromagnetic, all with a positive magnetic susceptibility) entities through magnetic instruments has emerged as a promising approach across various biological contexts. However, variations in the properties and descriptions of these instruments have led to a lack of reproducibility and comparability among studies. This article addresses the need for standardizing the characterization of magnetic instruments, with a specific focus on their ability to control the movement of paramagnetic objects within organisms. While it is well known that the force exerted on magnetic particles depends on the spatial variation (gradient) of the magnetic field, the magnitude of the field is often overlooked in the literature. Therefore, we comprehensively analyze and discuss both actors and propose a novel descriptor, termed 'effective gradient', which combines both dependencies. To illustrate the importance of both factors, we characterize different magnet systems and relate them to experiments involving superparamagnetic nanoparticles. This standardization effort aims to enhance the reproducibility and comparability of studies utilizing magnetic instruments for biological applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.