Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38570536›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Exploring the electrical robustness of conductive textile fasteners for wearable devices in different human motion conditions.

Afonso Fortes Ferreira, Helena Alves, Hugo Plácido da Silva, Nuno Marques, Ana Fred

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Afonso Fortes FerreiraInstituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores-Microsistemas e Nanotecnologias (INESC-MN), Lisbon, Portugal. afonsofortes@tecnico.ulisboa.pt.
Helena AlvesInstituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores-Microsistemas e Nanotecnologias (INESC-MN), Lisbon, Portugal. helena.alves@inesc-mn.pt.
Hugo Plácido da SilvaInstituto Superior Técnico (IST), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal. hugo.placido.silva@tecnico.ulisboa.pt.
Nuno MarquesMeia Mania Lda, Lousã, Portugal.
Ana FredInstituto Superior Técnico (IST), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

Agência Nacional de Inovação LISBOA-1-0247-FEDER-113480Agência para a Competitividade e Inovação C632491900-00467021Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/50008/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional snap fasteners used in clothing are often used as electrical connectors in e-textile and wearable applications for signal transmission due to their wide availability and ease of use. Nonetheless, limited research exists on the validation of these fasteners, regarding the impact of contact-induced high-amplitude artefacts, especially under motion conditions. In this work, three types of fasteners were used as electromechanical connectors, establishing the interface between a regular sock and an acquisition device. The tested fasteners have different shapes and sizes, as well as have different mechanisms of attachment between the plug and receptacle counterparts. Experimental evaluation was performed under static conditions, slow walking, and rope jumping at a high cadence. The tests were also performed with a test mass of 140 g. Magnetic fasteners presented excellent electromechanical robustness under highly dynamic human movement with and without the additional mass. On the other hand, it was demonstrated that the Spring snap buttons (with a spring-based engaging mechanism) presented a sub-optimal performance under high motion and load conditions, followed by the Prong snap fasteners (without spring), which revealed a high susceptibility to artefacts. Overall, this work provides further evidence on the importance and reliability of clothing fasteners as electrical connectors in wearable systems.

Indexed as

TextilesWearable Electronic DevicesElectric ConductivityElectricityHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID38570536
PMCPMC10991394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.