Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38570440›Full record

SynthesisBiochemical genetics2025

Meta-analysis to Unravel Core Transcriptomic Responses in Penaeus vannamei Exposed to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses.

Gangaraj Karyath Palliyath, Ashok Kumar Jangam, Vinaya Kumar Katneni, Nimisha Kaikkolante, Suganya Panjan Nathamuni, Roja Jayaraman, Syamadayal Jagabattula, Muralidhar Moturi, Mudagandur Shashi Shekhar

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biochemical genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gangaraj Karyath PalliyathICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, Chennai, India.
Ashok Kumar JangamICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, Chennai, India. ashok.jangam@icar.gov.in.
Vinaya Kumar KatneniICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, Chennai, India.
Nimisha KaikkolanteICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, Chennai, India.
Suganya Panjan NathamuniICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, Chennai, India.
Roja JayaramanICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, Chennai, India.
Syamadayal JagabattulaICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, Chennai, India.
Muralidhar MoturiICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, Chennai, India.
Mudagandur Shashi ShekharICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, Chennai, India.
Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shrimp farming, a dominant economic activity in coastal areas, is affected by different abiotic and biotic stress factors. These stressors, under poor management conditions, could affect growth and health of farmed animals. Understanding the common gene expressions in response to stress, regardless of the specific stress factor, holds significant importance in the field of functional genomics. Scope of this study is to identify the core transcriptomic responses in the shrimp species Penaeus vannamei exposed to various abiotic and biotic stress conditions and to decipher their functional importance. To achieve our objective, we gathered and analyzed multiple RNA-seq datasets related to twelve abiotic and nine biotic stress conditions. Through the in silico meta-analysis, we predicted 961 differentially expressed genes (meta-DEGs) for abiotic stress conditions and 517 meta-DEGs for biotic stress conditions, respectively. These meta-DEGs represent genes that are commonly expressed across different stress factors and are indicative of the organism's general response to stress. The annotation of nineteen core up-regulated meta-DEGs revealed their diverse functions in detoxification, cell adhesion, metal ion binding, and oxidative phosphorylation. These genes play a crucial role in stress response and immune defense. For abiotic stress, significant pathways associated with the stress response include tryptophan metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, fatty acid degradation, carbohydrate digestion and absorption, phenylalanine metabolism, drug metabolism-other enzymes, arachidonic acid metabolism, and fatty acid elongation. Similarly, for biotic stress, metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450, pentose and glucuronate interconversions, steroid hormone biosynthesis, and drug metabolism-cytochrome P450 were found to be significant pathway associations. In addition, the study also predicted 17 stress regulatory motifs present in the identified meta-DEGs. These motifs have significance in identifying the stress responses of the organism. The metabolic pathways and regulatory motifs associated with abiotic and biotic stress factors identified through this study could be a valuable resource for developing stress management approaches in shrimp aquaculture.

Indexed as

PenaeidaeStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptomeAnimalsAquacultureGene Expression ProfilingAbiotic stressBiotic stressMeta-DEGsPenaeus vannameiRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID38570440
OpenAlexW4393869227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.