ArticlePediatric cardiology2025
ALCAPA in Children with Complex Congenital Heart Disease: A Multicenter Study.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associated Cardiac and Extracardiac Anomalies in Patients with Abnormal Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Mid-Term Functional Recovery after Surgical Correction of ALCAPA: A 16-Year Single-Center Experience.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2026Article
- A rare complex association of truncus arteriosus with anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery: A case of rare congenital deformity.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Comparative Effects of HTK and St. Thomas Cardioplegia on Myocardial Outcomes and Sodium Balance in Pediatric Tetralogy of Fallot Surgery.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We sought to report characteristics and outcomes of children with complex anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) and to compare the outcomes to children with isolated ALCAPA. We performed a retrospective data analysis of children with ALCAPA who underwent cardiac surgery between 1/2009 and 3/2018 at 21 centers. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with complex ALCAPA are provided using descriptive statistics. Outcomes were compared between complex ALCAPA and isolated ALCAPA using Fisher's exact test. We reviewed 258 patients who underwent surgical repair of ALCAPA at 21 centers. We identified 10 patients (3.9%) with complex ALCAPA. Median age at initial cardiac surgery was 49 days (range: 4 days, 12.8 years). Cardiac lesions associated with ALCAPA were HLHS (n = 3); scimitar syndrome (n = 2); VSD with aortic coarctation (n = 2); VSD with right pulmonary artery discontinuity (1); DORV with mitral atresia (n = 1); and ToF (n = 1). ALCAPA was diagnosed prior to surgical intervention in 1 patient; during the initial cardiac surgery in 4 patients; in the early postoperative period via cardiac catheterization in 3 patients; and later in childhood after initial surgical repair in 2 patients. Following ALCAPA repair, patients with complex ALCAPA, as compared to patients with isolated ALCAPA, were more likely to be placed on ECMO (50% vs 12%, p = 0.002), receive CPR (30% vs 6%, p = 0.017), or suffer operative mortality (50% vs 3%, p < 0.001). Complex ALCAPA is uncommon. All but one with complex ALCAPA was not diagnosed preoperatively and postoperative morbidity and mortality were significantly greater in these complex patients compared to patients with isolated ALCAPA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.