Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38570301›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2024

Developmental anaesthesia neurotoxicity in humans: finding the sweet spot?

Laszlo Vutskits

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Laszlo VutskitsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care, and Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Geneva Neuroscience Center, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: Laszlo.Vutskits@hcuge.ch.
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent human epidemiological study in this issue of British Journal of Anaesthesia examined the association between anaesthesia exposure in pregnant women undergoing appendicectomy or cholecystectomy and the subsequent diagnosis of behavioural disorders in their offspring. When compared with unexposed children, prenatally exposed children had ∼30% greater likelihood of a diagnosis of disruptive or internalising behavioural disorders. Although these data are new and interesting, they should be interpreted with caution. Indeed, appendicitis and cholecystitis can produce acute and chronic systemic inflammation, and maternal immune activation can affect fetal neurodevelopment through inflammatory and epigenetic mechanisms. It is, therefore, possible that the findings are related to maternal and fetal inflammation than to anaesthesia exposure. As there is no causal evidence for the implication that anaesthesia and surgery induce such pathologies, it is unwise to consider alternative treatments when surgery is indicated in pregnant patients.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsChildFemaleHumansInflammationPregnancydevelopmentneurotoxicitypaediatric anaesthesiapregnancyprenatal exposure

Identifiers

PMID38570301
OpenAlexW4393857519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.