ArticleBone2024
Human nonunion tissues display differential gene expression in comparison to physiological fracture callus.
Article in Bone, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mining and experimental validation of machine learning-based immune-related diagnostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Deciphering the Osteoimmune Landscape in Subtalar Arthrodesis: A Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Approach.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Current cutting-edge omics techniques on musculoskeletal tissues and diseases.Bone research · 2025Review
- Management of Distal Femoral Non-union: A Systematic Review.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Activation of Wnt signaling in human fracture callus and nonunion tissues.Bone reports · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The healing of bone fractures can become aberrant and lead to nonunions which in turn have a negative impact on patient health. Understanding why a bone fails to normally heal will enable us to make a positive impact in a patient's life. While we have a wealth of molecular data on rodent models of fracture repair, it is not the same with humans. As such, there is still a lack of information regarding the molecular differences between normal physiological repair and nonunions. This study was designed to address this gap in our molecular knowledge of the human repair process by comparing differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between physiological fracture callus and two different nonunion types, hypertrophic (HNU) and oligotrophic (ONU). RNA sequencing data revealed over ∼18,000 genes in each sample. Using the physiological callus as the control and the nonunion samples as the experimental groups, bioinformatic analyses identified 67 and 81 statistically significant DEGs for HNU and ONU, respectively. Out of the 67 DEGs for the HNU, 34 and 33 were up and down-regulated, respectively. Similarly, out of the 81 DEGs for the ONU, 48 and 33 were up and down-regulated, respectively. Additionally, we also identified common genes between the two nonunion samples; 8 (10.8 %) upregulated and 12 (22.2 %) downregulated. We further identified many biological processes, with several statistically significant ones. Some of these were related to muscle and were common between the two nonunion samples. This study represents the first comprehensive attempt to understand the global molecular events occurring in human nonunion biology. With further research, we can perhaps decipher new molecular pathways involved in aberrant healing of human bone fractures that can be therapeutically targeted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.