Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38569979›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2024

Computational limits to the legibility of the imaged human brain.

James K Ruffle, Robert J Gray, Samia Mohinta, Guilherme Pombo, Chaitanya Kaul, Harpreet Hyare, Geraint Rees, Parashkev Nachev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James K RuffleQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: j.ruffle@ucl.ac.uk.
Robert J GrayQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Samia MohintaQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Guilherme PomboQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Chaitanya KaulSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Harpreet HyareQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Geraint ReesQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Parashkev NachevQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: p.nachev@ucl.ac.uk.
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust 213038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our knowledge of the organisation of the human brain at the population-level is yet to translate into power to predict functional differences at the individual-level, limiting clinical applications and casting doubt on the generalisability of inferred mechanisms. It remains unknown whether the difficulty arises from the absence of individuating biological patterns within the brain, or from limited power to access them with the models and compute at our disposal. Here we comprehensively investigate the resolvability of such patterns with data and compute at unprecedented scale. Across 23 810 unique participants from UK Biobank, we systematically evaluate the predictability of 25 individual biological characteristics, from all available combinations of structural and functional neuroimaging data. Over 4526 GPU*hours of computation, we train, optimize, and evaluate out-of-sample 700 individual predictive models, including fully-connected feed-forward neural networks of demographic, psychological, serological, chronic disease, and functional connectivity characteristics, and both uni- and multi-modal 3D convolutional neural network models of macro- and micro-structural brain imaging. We find a marked discrepancy between the high predictability of sex (balanced accuracy 99.7%), age (mean absolute error 2.048 years, R

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingChild, PreschoolChronic DiseaseEmotionsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerNeuroimagingArtificial intelligenceBrain functionBrain structureDeep learningFunctional connectivityHigh performance computingMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID38569979
PMCPMC7618188
OpenAlexW4394004580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.