Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38569925›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Visual Recognition Memory of Scenes Is Driven by Categorical, Not Sensory, Visual Representations.

Ricardo Morales-Torres, Erik A Wing, Lifu Deng, Simon W Davis, Roberto Cabeza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. What makes memories vivid?Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ricardo Morales-TorresDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.ORCID 0000-0001-9169-3663
Erik A WingRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Ontario M6A 2E1, Canada.
Lifu DengDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.
Simon W DavisDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.ORCID 0000-0002-5943-0756
Roberto CabezaDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 cabeza@duke.edu.

Funding

Adaptive Neuromodulation of Working Memory Networks in Aging and DementiaR01AG075417 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Simon W Davis · 2022 to 2026
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG075417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When we perceive a scene, our brain processes various types of visual information simultaneously, ranging from sensory features, such as line orientations and colors, to categorical features, such as objects and their arrangements. Whereas the role of sensory and categorical visual representations in predicting subsequent memory has been studied using isolated objects, their impact on memory for complex scenes remains largely unknown. To address this gap, we conducted an fMRI study in which female and male participants encoded pictures of familiar scenes (e.g., an airport picture) and later recalled them, while rating the vividness of their visual recall. Outside the scanner, participants had to distinguish each seen scene from three similar lures (e.g., three airport pictures). We modeled the sensory and categorical visual features of multiple scenes using both early and late layers of a deep convolutional neural network. Then, we applied representational similarity analysis to determine which brain regions represented stimuli in accordance with the sensory and categorical models. We found that categorical, but not sensory, representations predicted subsequent memory. In line with the previous result, only for the categorical model, the average recognition performance of each scene exhibited a positive correlation with the average visual dissimilarity between the item in question and its respective lures. These results strongly suggest that even in memory tests that ostensibly rely solely on visual cues (such as forced-choice visual recognition with similar distractors), memory decisions for scenes may be primarily influenced by categorical rather than sensory representations.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyAdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung Adultepisodic memoryrecognition memoryrepresentational similarity analysisscene memory

Identifiers

PMID38569925
PMCPMC11112637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.