Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38569697›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Prospective diagnostic accuracy study of history taking and physical examination for adults with vertigo in general practice: study protocol.

Andrew Ross, Anna-Marie Rebecca Leemeyer, Tjasse D Bruintjes, Jochen W L Cals, Adolfo Bronstein, Roeland B van Leeuwen, Birgit Lissenberg-Witte, Vincent Alexander van Vugt, Sandra Rutgers, Otto R Maarsingh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew RossDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-6032
Anna-Marie Rebecca LeemeyerDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3600-1614
Tjasse D BruintjesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jochen W L CalsDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9550-5674
Adolfo BronsteinNeuro-otology Unit, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Roeland B van LeeuwenDepartment of Neurology, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
Birgit Lissenberg-WitteDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent Alexander van VugtDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2746-4820
Sandra RutgersPatient association Hoormij NVVS, Houten, The Netherlands.
Otto R MaarsinghDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands o.maarsingh@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-3747-9217
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLGelre Hospitals · NLImperial College London · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVertigo is a prevalent and burdensome symptom. More than 80% of patients with vertigo are primarily treated by their general practitioner (GP) and are never referred to a medical specialist. Despite this therapeutic responsibility, the GP's diagnostic toolkit has serious limitations. All recommended tests lack empirical evidence, because a diagnostic accuracy study on vestibular disorders ('How well does test x discriminate between patients with or without target condition y?') has never been performed in general practice. The VERtigo DIagnosis study aims to fill this gap. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a diagnostic accuracy study on vertigo of primary vestibular origin in general practice to assess the discriminative ability of history taking and physical examination. We will compare all index tests with a respective reference standard. We will focus on five target conditions that account for more than 95% of vertigo diagnoses in general practice: (1) benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, (2) vestibular neuritis, (3) Ménière's disease, (4) vestibular migraine (VM) and (5) central causes other than VM. As these five target conditions have a different pathophysiology and lack one generally accepted gold standard, we will use consensus diagnosis as a construct reference standard. Data for each patient, including history, physical examination and additional tests as recommended by experts in an international Delphi procedure, will be recorded on a standardised form and independently reviewed by a neurologist and otorhinolaryngologist. For each patient, the reviewers have to decide about the presence/absence of each target condition. We will calculate sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios and diagnostic ORs, followed by decision rules for each target condition. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study obtained approval from the Vrije Universiteit Medical Center Medical Ethical Review Committee (reference: 2022.0817-NL83111.029.22). We will publish our findings in peer-reviewed international journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN97250704.

Indexed as

General PracticeMigraine DisordersAdultBenign Paroxysmal Positional VertigoHumansMedical History TakingPhysical ExaminationProspective StudiesAdult otolaryngologyPrimary CarePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID38569697
PMCPMC10989125
OpenAlexW4393868708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.